Josh Perry played well I thought, the first penalty was harsh he was on him for 4 seconds at the most. Another penalty for a 'high' tackle was over the shoulder. He was poor for Catalans first try, lazy defence. Apart from that he played well.

I see you were watching through red & white coloured glasses as well,2 catalans good catalans tries not given and 1 saints try with a 2 metre forward pass| KEEP BELIEVING

The officials in rugby league make me sick to the core but to suggest that the French would have won this game by miles is a very silly suggestion!

The Trolling skills are weak in you young padawan ...

Well that's me put in my place sir, im'e not the messiah im'e just a silly boy!

Shocking video ref decision.

As for perry head high all night.

An even game for me but Catalan shaded it.

If you watch the kick again, you can see the Catalan player jumps no where near the ball his jump is entirely timed to knock Makinson. If he was challenging for a ball, then he needs to actually get near the ball not just jump into a man.

I agree it's a 50/50 call, but sometimes they go for you other times they don't.

However I see from your massive 12 posts you missed all the poor calls Saints got.

Keep on Trolling...

It's a shame we are talking about the ref when we've just seen a top class exciting game.

I think it was 100% try. How the video ref can't give a try when he can watch it over and over in slow motion is unreal.

I understand the challenging for the ball, but seriously when he jumps he gets no where near the ball, he's already coming down before the ball hits makinsons hand.

I can see it both ways and yes it could have gone the other way, but for me if you are challenging on a kick you have to actually go for the ball and not just the man.

Tommy fluffed it, get over it and move on!

I would have been spitting fire if we'd lost a game to that decision, but it's hard to argue with it. Millard doesn't get near the ball and moves Makinson a few feet. It's lucky for Makinson though, he made a right mess of it and it would have cost us the game. The mistakes are creeping into his game.

I'd have been gutted if it was Saints and on balance I'd say it was a try.

However, Millard jumps and gets nowhere near the ball, yet it's his jump into Makinson which leads to the ball ending up loose over the line. I can understand why there was doubt.

I can see it both ways too but in all honesty he didnt make much of an effort for the ball and he did have hands on makinson

How did Thaler get away with asking the VR's opinion on almost everything tonight?

I was thinking the same.

Decisions sometimes go for you and sometimes against.

What is inexcusable was Thalers different interpretation of last weeks and tonights game. Last week he wouldn't use the video referee, tonight he wouldn't make a decision without one.

It's what drives all fans crazy.

tbh I was quite happy last week and apart from the red card I'm quite chuffed tonight. Peed on your bonfire of course which is a bonus

I'd like to see the rules on what the the ref can check for with the video ref.

You call that top-class and exciting?

Let's just say I enjoyed it, my mates enjoyed and every saints fan did.

Just because the Catalan player waves his arm in the air everyone thinks he played for the ball when in truth he never got anywhere near it.

I was watching it in my adopted town with a few dozen dire fans and they all agreed that when the catalan player went up for the ball he gave a nudge in the side of the saints player altering his upwards projection.
They reluctantly agreed it cannot be a try (ALL OF THEM) and they were right.

Believe me none of them were wanting us to win so no red and white specs were worn.
I don't know how you can make the statement above when most of warrington saw it as a no try?

If it was a game with no Video ref, then I agree 9 times out of 10 it will be a try. But the video ref changes so many tries and no tries as you can see things that in real time look like a fluff by makinson. But once you see it back on the video, the reason he misses is down to being moved off the ball. Like I said fair enough if he was anywhere near the ball, but he's basically just running in.

Something wrong with your eye's mate,get to spacsavers.Save your childish remarks for kindergarten.

Great game ,could have gone either way.