I wish Jamie the best, yes as Tony Stark says he had small problems with his off field activites but he gave gis everything, but it seems that was decided last season was not good enough, I really hope he does well.

There are plenty of people out there who do not like Jamie for things other than Rugby, just at there are those who will like him for those things.

Nevertheless, I think we can say with certainty that most people have not met Jamie so our opinions of him as a person are very remote whether good or bad, and I would doubt that anyone Sober has ever said to his face, that he was not committed to Saints, because of his outside interests.

Whether someone has a good or bad opinion about him, I really doubt that it has anything to do with appendage sizes. As on the simplest level, that does not account for women who dislike him, or like him, for the very same reasons. I generally find that the size of anything is a bad indicator of someone’s judgement. I think a statistical analysis would show that there is barely any direct or indirect coloration at all. Even Brain size would not be a direct indicator of judgement.

Now now, there's no need to bring race or colour into it...





Correlation

Except Tony Stark didn't actually say that. He said that [iother people[/i had problems with Jamie's off-field activities. Foster had a life, a life which some daft fans would not accept was his right.

With the stats posted by Tony Stark, if Jamie Foster had been almost anyone else, or alternatively ugly with bad hair do, driving a Fiat Punto and working as a bricky, Saints fans of all kinds would have been baying for the blood of the club in letting him go.

You don't have to say it directly, you can imply or insinuate something, which is clearly what you did. You do this alot, make a comment and then when people disagree you become pedantic and point to the fact you didn't say those exact words.

Please don't pity me. I don't want or need it from anyone, least of all you. And at no point have I become steamed up as you put it. It would take far more than somebody like you to get under my skin.

Back on topic, do you actually think about what you're saying before you say it? The reason I say this is because you question where I get the 10% from despite the fact I clealry point out where it comes from. It comes from the amount of people who have spoken to with regards to Foster who believe he deserves to be in the team. What is difficult to follow about that?

No. I didn't. You might have inferred something but that is your problem, not mine.


TranslationPlease don't pity me. I don't want or need it from anyone, least of all you. And at no point have I become steamed up as you put it. It would take far more than somebody like you to get under my skin. '"

Please tell me you haven't just compared Jamie Foster to Jamie Lyon? I may have to slap you next time you're at football if you have!

From the odd couple of stories I have heard about him, he seems like the complete opposite of the persona that he seems to have generated, which is odd really.

Wish him all the luck in the future.

Ditto here.

Jamie is a top lad! He can be a little vain but he's great with the kids signing autographs and even having a pass about with them down a brook.

Only in terms of the points they accumulated in their Saints careers, not them as players

As a huge JL fan I'd never contemplate such a thing.

He's a lovely lad, tweeted him last year when he said he was bored, he replied, came down and did a kicking session with Brook U16s, gave them his boots and coat, sent his grandad the week after with a training top for the man of the match as he was having a hernia op. Friendly, unassuming, brilliant with the lads.