Can't spake.

Well a change in the laws are needed then because no way was Sinfield going to cause injury but Walmsley was and did

Very fortunate just one match, still thought two was fair, they just seem in a complete mess with disciplinary, the appeal by Batley and returning the points has opened an hornets nest, can anyone appeal on a past precedence now however long ago it was??

Walmsley was guilty of poor technique for the tackle, deservedly a sending off but wasnt a shoulder charge just a high tackle...look at past suspensions for high tackles and it is pretty consistent with that. In your logic, Jermaine McGillvray made contact with Matty Dawson and knocked him clean out, forcing him to be stretchered off the field. Does that mean he should be banned for more than 2 games??

Sinfield made a deliberate and conscious decision to headbutt another player...now I'm no expert in nutting people but I am pretty confident nobody has ever headbutted another person without aiming to hurt them. I'm pretty sure he could have caused numerous injuries to Dorn from doing that so a pretty pointless & pathetic argument on both parts really dont you think??

I think sometimes people compare matches missed without looking at the initial punishment.

Some of the two match bans for high tackles, did not get a Red.

A headbutt couldnt cause injury .. really ?

fractured cheekbone
broken nose
broken jaw
consusion

To name a few , 3 of those 4 carry the possibility of needing surgury to fix the other could means weeks out of the game.