I'd have been gutted if it was Saints and on balance I'd say it was a try.

However, Millard jumps and gets nowhere near the ball, yet it's his jump into Makinson which leads to the ball ending up loose over the line. I can understand why there was doubt.

I can see it both ways too but in all honesty he didnt make much of an effort for the ball and he did have hands on makinson

How did Thaler get away with asking the VR's opinion on almost everything tonight?

I was thinking the same.

Decisions sometimes go for you and sometimes against.

What is inexcusable was Thalers different interpretation of last weeks and tonights game. Last week he wouldn't use the video referee, tonight he wouldn't make a decision without one.

It's what drives all fans crazy.

tbh I was quite happy last week and apart from the red card I'm quite chuffed tonight. Peed on your bonfire of course which is a bonus

I'd like to see the rules on what the the ref can check for with the video ref.

You call that top-class and exciting?

Let's just say I enjoyed it, my mates enjoyed and every saints fan did.

Just because the Catalan player waves his arm in the air everyone thinks he played for the ball when in truth he never got anywhere near it.

I was watching it in my adopted town with a few dozen dire fans and they all agreed that when the catalan player went up for the ball he gave a nudge in the side of the saints player altering his upwards projection.
They reluctantly agreed it cannot be a try (ALL OF THEM) and they were right.

Believe me none of them were wanting us to win so no red and white specs were worn.
I don't know how you can make the statement above when most of warrington saw it as a no try?