I don't see what's wrong with playing Wheeler at 6. Yes he's less experienced than Pryce but there's only one way he'll gain that experience, and that's playing him.

Playing Wheeler against Wigan proved to me that he can do it, if needed. I see Wheeler as our future 6, so why not play him there when Pryce's injured?

OMG! Did you make a New Year's resolution to be more reasonable this season? It's working great. I just hope we don't lose a match...

I never called wheeler at all, in fact I think he's going to be a good player.

I don't think it's the right time to be playing two inexperienced halfbacks. We need to win against Salford and I think eastmond will benefit from having a experienced player alongside him.

Only one way to get experience and games like Salford are precisely the sort of games we should trust in our young players rather than crow-barring a back rower into the halves in their place.

To be honest, is it ever the right time to be playing inexperienced halfbacks? But we did the Wilkin thing for some of the Grand Final and it didn't work then. It didn't work at all except for one game against Leeds. Kyle Eastmond is actually relatively experienced in the halfback role and as he gets back up to speed he will be more dynamic there. Meanwhile, we have two young halfbacks chomping at the bit and the only way they will become experienced is by giving them that experience.

I understand where you are coming from. A win would be great against Salford; against everyone, come to think of it! But we lost four Grand Finals in a row and the last one to Wigan. Is there anything worse than that? Not to me. So if we lose, we lose. But our halfbacks will get another game under their belt, learn from it and be better next time around.

Wheeler at 6 is miles better than Wilko at 6, Wheels and Kyle have played 6 and 7 together loads of times