Quote: SaintsFan "You've just made an assumption but when people are behaving OTT they usually do.
Since you're not a doctor, then, you have no more clue than you say - very graphically - that I do. Therefore I will show the same level of regard for what you say in this matter than you have shown for what I say.'"
[i"...Nah...nah...nah...nah...nah...I'm...sticking...my...fingers...in...my...ears...in...response...to...pesky...facts"[/i
I don't take any notice of you (other than for purposes of ridicule) because you are a demonstrable fool.
Despite not knowing
ANYTHING about his prior medical history you just
KNOW - via some weird process of
INTUITION which you term
"logic" - that it can ... no
MUST ... make him more susceptible to knee injuries. I merely pointed out that in some cases of knee injury - ACL grafts - the joint is in fact left operationally stronger. To which you threw your teddy out of the pram and demanded to know my medical credentials (this is despite the fact that I made
NO ASSUMPTIONS about Soliola's problems in the NRL).
I wouldn't be all that bothered if you did know the details of his initial knee injury, did bit of research on the matter (from credible sources) and then claimed he may be at increased risk (as Soliola may well be following his Patellar reconstruction). But no - you turn ignorance into a virtue and expect people to agree with
"logic" that argues a player
MUST be more injury prone after sustaining a knee injury - the details of which you know (and care) nothing about - and the treatment of which you know (and care) nothing about.
