ive heard that saints are not giving Adam quinlen a contract for next season. Would not be a bad signing for us. I think hardaker could fill the hole sinny is going to leave. Just think of the bursts he could make and have quinlen in his shoulder to finish moves off. Them 2 alone together could destroy many of teams next season. What does everybody think ?

After a good start, he has looked pretty e in my opinion, so no thanks. You don't waste an overseas spot on that level.

Not for me. A lightweight player with a decent turn of speed. Backs up well and that's about it.
Wakefield , Bulls , Leigh perhaps .

Not exactly a solid defender - send him back home. Not good enough for Saints therefore not good enough for us.

Yeh... No thanks. Our backline is perhaps one area we dont need a signing

Hardaker has just made the MOS shortlist, why move him from the position he achieved it in?

It's not an unknown phenomenon on this forum though is it?

Ryan Hall for second row anyone

A player who looks just about the weakest player in the Saints team is not one I would advise pursuing.

Wow. How to not appreciate when you have a good thing. Leeds back line is about as good as it gets. Why try to change it by adding a less able player.
Surely Sutcliffe will take Sinfield's role and Handley and Golding would surely be in front of Quinlen as replacements........and Kienhorst for that matter.

Quite right.I don't think any sane Leeds fan would want the three quarter line altering at this time.

NO.

[sizeNO[/size

[sizeNO WAY JOSE[/size [sizeHE'S A SCRUM HALF NOT A FULL BACK[/size

No thanks. If we want to see another team like this one, we have to be happy to see youngsters brought through from the academy as well as buying in established talent. That might mean biting down and enduring a few mediocre seasons where we win sweet FA until the squad that emerges through the rebuild of the next few years, finds its rhythm and balance.