He can't help himself and read the rant posted by bell end Melling! www.skysports.com/opinion/story/ ... s-bookmark

He can't help himself and read the rant posted by bell end Melling! www.skysports.com/opinion/story/ ... s-bookmark

What a complete and utter w*nker!

Rugby Gods???? What utter nonsense!

With this stupid ridiculous logic I would ask phil what did he do wrong to deserve a broken neck?

Wigan supporters are truly an embarrassment to the sport, after ten years of reading comments on RLFans I cannot recall such an extended reaction to some innocuous passage of play against their cherry and white gods, life must be one long tirade of moaning and wailing in that no-horse town.

Very reasonable of him to admit, only just, that it shouldn't have been a Penalty Try (which not even the righteous fools on Cherry & Pravda were claiming)

He's got some brass neck as that Clarke.

I lost all respect for Clarke's opinions on anything RL related a long time ago.
He's clearly in the early stages of Dementia and hopefully will lead to him being removed from the Sky screens soon.

I agree with him... I do think McGuire would have caught Carmont but also fully understand why he did what he did and a couple of ex-pros I know have all said the same thing, that would have probably done exactly the same in the same situation. If Clarke can't understand why McGuire did it, he needs a punch in the mouth from the Rugby Gods!

I've just asked Phil the following question:

"How many of the penalties you gave away throughout your career did you deserve a serious injury for?"

Will it get published? Will it 'eck.

I have had a lot of respect for Clarke. I think he has opinions and they are not always popular, but generally reasonable even if you don't agree with them. I also think he's a good guy as well.
But this is total bull$!t. I can only assume that deep, deep down he's sick of the sight of Leeds beating teams that they "shouldn't". He comes from an era where everyone knew their place - losers to Wigan. And Leeds were the biggest under achievers of the lot. He's basically come across as someone who would support anyone against Leeds. His Saint Helens lovefest was a translocation of his Wigan support to a team that fitted the bill as conquerers of the teams he has deemed "unworthy". The Bulls, then us. But now Wigan are "back" his true colours are revealed.
If he has an editor then he should have rejected this. It's garbage, absolute garbage and unworthy of any serious commentator. The admission regarding a penalty try should be taken as exactly what it was. An ineference that it should have been a penalty try. I have heard nobody say it should have been a penalty try until he came along. Which means he's thought of it all by himself and decided to put his thoughts in print.
As for "injustice", "revenge". I'm sick of clubs and commentators pulling this gag. Injustice is a team being relegated because the team that should have gone down breached the salary cap to keep them in the Superleague, not a small tug on a shirt with a 1% chance of scoring a try in the last second of a game that they didn't deserve to win on their performance over the 80 minutes.
Wigan lost that game because they dropped a shedload of ball in their own half and their dicslipline was poor. They also met a team that gave them a lesson in playoff football and were organised and clinical. If they want to concentrate on anything it should be ball control.

Phil, I have lost all respect for you mate. I hope that should Leeds meet Wigan again in the playoffs this year that they post your comments on the Leeds changeing room wall.

Should be there already! What a form of motivation to have then to see Clarke having to attempt to say nice things should we win at Old Trafford