Webb 8 - Leeds most creative player, safe as houses at FB.
Hall 7 - good going forward, great finishing.
Senior 4 - legs have gone, leaves his winger exposed time and time again.
Delaney 7 - top grafter, good defensively, good player.
Smith 5 - still finding his feet after his 6 months in RU.
McGuire 7 - showed some real quality, defence is questionable.
Burrow 4 - injured.
Bailey 6 - average, at fault for the Jefferies try.
Buderus 7 - neat and tidy error free rugby, game winning try.
Peacock 9 - outstanding shift from an outstanding player.
JJB 6 - cut out the errors and penalties, much better when he does.
Kirke 8 - put his hand up when nobody else around him did, really impressed.
Sinfield 5 - thinks he's better than he is, a pretty poor game from the skipper.

Diskin 7 - great running from DH when Wakefield ran out of steam, good game.
Ambler 7 - best game in a Leeds shirt.
Clarkson 7 - out of the up and coming bunch looks to have a real chance in the game.
Burgess 6 - is to defending what Stevie Wonder is to precision targetting.

cant argue too much with them, have to say poorest performance ive ever seen by Senior

Really???

Spoon fed Hall for his scores. Classic 'draw your man and pass centre stuff'

And was the main reason we scored the winner.

That input and you declare it his poorest performance?

The club have high hopes for him, he does look a good prospect thats for sure. Still only 19/20yo

When you compare him to Amor it really puts into perspective the standard of the National Leagues to SL.

I take all into account.

But his poorest performance it was not.

In that game he had pro-active, positive, moments that also need to be flagged.

Would you agree? Because it was fact.

Or is it the usual 'Seniors garbage' ramblings?

Bless.

I'd be sorry for having 'that' original opinion also.

It's quite funny to see positive aspects (which were around a handful) in the 'poorest performance'.

Bit of an OTT reaction to say the least.

both our hookers were outstanding, would have given a mark higher

Sinfield deserves a low mark for second week running

Ambler and CC both get kudos from me

Webb 7 - Safe but still doesnt look 100%
Hall 7 - Worked hard and got his reward
Senior 6 - Not his best game yet his winger got a hat trick
Delaney 7 - Made some hard yards. Solid
Smith 5 - Disappointing, not yet found his feet back in RL.
McGuire 6 - Reasonable effort, nothing spectaculor
Burrow ? - Not enough time to really rate
Bailey 7 - Made some solid runs early, worked hard.
Buderus 7 - Solid effort
Peacock 9 - the reason we got a roll on, MOM by a mile in my eyes
JJB 6 - His game seems limited at the moment, not enough breaks
Kirke 7 - Put his hand up and did a lot of graft
Sinfield 5 - Bit of a shocker at times, knocked back in tackle far more than usual.

Diskin 8 - Took control from Dummy Half and made yards, also won smart penaties.
Ambler 7 - Stood up well, certainly doesnt look out of place.
Clarkson 7 - Came back well from his rookie mistake to turn in a good shift.
Burgess 6 - Runs hard, defence too leaden footed at times and is a work in progress.


Wasnt the greatest of performances against what in my opinion is a pretty average Wakefield side.

Yeah the path he treads is narrow and the drop is sheer and very high but I'm sure the sky's the limit for him, so point him at the sky!

John Kear - "I feel the best side lost but they scored more points than us on the scoreboard.”

WRONG JOHN – WRONG, the best team is the one that scored the most points. Simples.

Could someone please explain to me what is so difficult to understand about this premise?

If you score more points than your opposition then you are better than they are, making you the best team. I usually have a lot of respect for John Kear but this time John is talking crap.