My Team for the semi would be.

1 Connolly
2. Chev
3. McKenna
4. Senior
5. Calderwood
6. Dunneman
7. McGuire
8. Mcdonald
9. Diskin
10.Bailey
11.Furner
12.Adamson
13.Sinny

subs
Feather
Mcdermott
Burrow
Poching

McGuire did enough last night to warrant a start - bet he does not even make the 17. Cummins will play so Chev on bench, Burrow will start so it is either Poching or Danny - bet DP has got the bottle to drop Cummins.

1 Connolly
2. Chev
3. McKenna
4. Senior
5. Calderwood
6. Maguire
7. Burrow
8. Mcdonald
9. Diskin
10.Bailey
11.Furner
12.Adamson
13.Sinfield

subs
Feather
Mcdermott
Dunneman
Cummins


I would bring Chev and Bailey in even though we won as I could see the semis being a much tougher game and sticking with the winning team may not be enough.

1. Connolly
2. Chev
3. McKenna
4. Senior
5. Calderwood
6. Dunneman
7. McGuire
8. Bailey
9. Diskin
10. McDermott
11. Furner
12. Adamson
13. Sinfield

14. Feather
15. McDonald
16. Poching
17. Burrow

The must haves
Connolly
Calderwood
Senior
Dunnemann
McDermott
disko
Wayne Mac
Furner
Adamson
Sinfield
Feather

The competion, for the remaining 6 places
Burrow
McGuire
Poching
Chev
McKenna (can't see him being dropped)
Wardy
Bailey
Franny

So we will have to drop 2 out of those 8
Who will it be
I'll gamble at Wardy and The other is very very hard, but I'll say Chev will be "not fully recovered"

Barring any unknown injuries, I am pretty certain DP will start with the same 13. Subs may be different with maybe chev in for Willie.

Wouldn't be at all surprised if the entire 17 is unchanged. They did the job on Saturday so I'd be inclined to let them do it again.

What I cannot understand is why Leeds are still outsiders for the cup????

Chris

How often do saints lose a really big game. Can they really play that badly again and can we raise our game to the another level - If we don't get off to bad start I think we have their beating

Did they honestly play THAT badly ? I thought they played as well as we let them - our forwards dominated theirs and forced them into errors and restricted their ability to offload.

I wouldn't mind betting that we committed much more "unenforced errors" than they did, whereas all of their handling errors seemed to be forced by our defence.

To be honest, in the greater scheme of things, I think you might as well discount this weeks match as having any sort of effect on the cup match. The logic that we beat saints once therefore will beat them the following week doesn't follow. Look at Giants, beat saints last week yet were given a close ride by wakefield...does this suggest that wakefield are on an even sort of footing with the Saints?
For any cup match you can throw the form book out of the window. The lads did the deed this week, they have to raise their game another level to do the same again, complacency loses matches.

Agree that Saturday's match will have no effect from a Saints perspective, but from our lads perspective they really did get a monkey off their back.

Imagine the effect another late defeat or worse still, a solid hammering might have had on our boys.

My team would be:

1. Connolly
2. Calderwood
3. McKenna
4. Senior
5. Walker (OK, he's not a winger, but his form is better than FC's, but may be injured anyway)
6. Dunneman
7. Burrow
8. McDonald
9. Diskin
10. Bailey
11. Furner
12. Adamson
13. Sinfield

14. McGuire
15. McDermott
16. Poching
17. Feather

Starting McGuire and Burrow together is suicide defensively, and criminal because Dunneman is playing well at the moment.

LadyDee

I think you underestimate the physcological effect - we also don't know how seriously Saints took the game - if they took it seriously and got beat easy then they will be nervous of what could happen on Sat.

If they genuinely believed they could beat anyone if they really put there mind to it - then defeat in the last two weeks will have seriously dented there confidence.

I think if we play as we did on Saturday we should win

mathers in for cummins, you can tell the guy's itching to get on....just look at saturdays game, the amount of times he was told to get off the pitch!haha......

connolly
mathers
mckenna
senior
callderwood
dunnemann
mcguire
barrie
diskin
mcdonald
adamson
furner
sinfield

burrow
ward
cummins
feather/poaching

byes

james-david

Connolly

Chev Walker
McKenna
Senior
Calderwood

McGuire
Dunemann

Barrie Mac
Diskin
Wayne Mac
Furner
Adamson
Sinfield

Bailey (if fit)
Feather
Poching
Burrow/Cummins

Connolly (Picks himself, had a solid performance on Sat).

Calderwood (Having a good season, deserves place).
McKenna (Good game on Sat, should be back to full potential for semi).

Senior (Cannot leave him out of the side, just wish he would help his winger in defence).
Cummins (His form may be erratic, however cannot leave someone with his experience out of the side, did little wrong on Sat, needs more support in defence).

Dunemann (Defensively he is rock solid, really closed down Scully and Long on Sat, much the same needed for the semi).
Maguire (Can create much more than Burrow in attack, deserves a start).

McDermott (Need a solid start in the forwards, you don't get more solid than Barrie).
Disko (Having a good season, no reason for him not to start).
Ward (Works well with Barrie, wouldn't risk Bailey).

Furner (Showed how much we missed him against Huddersfield).
Adamson (Great in defence, makes good yards in attack).
Sinny (He has come on leaps and bounds since being given the captaincy).

Subs

Macdonald and Feather (Both great coming off the bench, real impact players).
Poching (Made alot of difference when he came on for Adamson on Sat, deserves to keep his place).
Burrow (Much better off the bench when Saints forwards are tiring).

I have not included Chev or Bailey, as they are both coming back from injury, and should not be risked.

I have not included Mathers, because although he is a great prospect for the future, he does not have the experience in big cup games.

Agree entirely! Except switch Dunemann and McGuire so that McGuire's at stand-off and Dunemann's at scrum-half. Gives Mcguire more space and Dunemann's still good at scrum-half.