IMO thought so, defensively poor, granted he put Hall in for his scores but by his own high standards thought it was a shocker

He was shocking, although clearly from your side the defensive side of the game has passed you by.

I take all into account.

But his poorest performance it was not.

In that game he had pro-active, positive, moments that also need to be flagged.

Would you agree? Because it was fact.

Or is it the usual 'Seniors garbage' ramblings?

Bless.

Oh i'm sorry for having an opinion, i did say he put Hall in for his tries so have flagged positive aspects

Senior is not the player he was, get over it

I'd be sorry for having 'that' original opinion also.

It's quite funny to see positive aspects (which were around a handful) in the 'poorest performance'.

Bit of an OTT reaction to say the least.

both our hookers were outstanding, would have given a mark higher

Sinfield deserves a low mark for second week running

Ambler and CC both get kudos from me

Webb 7 - Safe but still doesnt look 100%
Hall 7 - Worked hard and got his reward
Senior 6 - Not his best game yet his winger got a hat trick
Delaney 7 - Made some hard yards. Solid
Smith 5 - Disappointing, not yet found his feet back in RL.
McGuire 6 - Reasonable effort, nothing spectaculor
Burrow ? - Not enough time to really rate
Bailey 7 - Made some solid runs early, worked hard.
Buderus 7 - Solid effort
Peacock 9 - the reason we got a roll on, MOM by a mile in my eyes
JJB 6 - His game seems limited at the moment, not enough breaks
Kirke 7 - Put his hand up and did a lot of graft
Sinfield 5 - Bit of a shocker at times, knocked back in tackle far more than usual.

Diskin 8 - Took control from Dummy Half and made yards, also won smart penaties.
Ambler 7 - Stood up well, certainly doesnt look out of place.
Clarkson 7 - Came back well from his rookie mistake to turn in a good shift.
Burgess 6 - Runs hard, defence too leaden footed at times and is a work in progress.


Wasnt the greatest of performances against what in my opinion is a pretty average Wakefield side.

Yeah the path he treads is narrow and the drop is sheer and very high but I'm sure the sky's the limit for him, so point him at the sky!

John Kear - "I feel the best side lost but they scored more points than us on the scoreboard.”

WRONG JOHN – WRONG, the best team is the one that scored the most points. Simples.

Could someone please explain to me what is so difficult to understand about this premise?

If you score more points than your opposition then you are better than they are, making you the best team. I usually have a lot of respect for John Kear but this time John is talking crap.

Agreed! wakey were shocking in the second half! spineless! Simply spineless were wakey!

Delaney - Still not 100% sure about this guy and was 'away with the fairies' when the ball went loose in the corner.

Diskin - Was really slow at A-H-B when we were trying to chase the game just before H / T ....

In the first half, it was the usual Leeds giving away silly penalties coupled with rubbish defence that let Wakeyfield in. Some of the tackling was frankly, shocking. What's up with our nasty b*stard defence that used to batter teams ? It seems to have gone out of our game and thankfully, there were still some players who stood up and were counted last night.

Luckily, someone brought the Get Out Of Jail Free card to Scotland and we duly used it.

Still, it was great to hear the whinge of so many bitter Wakey fans and we really are hated again ... Which means we must still be a force in the game. There was a great shot on the Sky coverage of a bloke, who'd obviously had to put up with the same sort of dribble I had to listen to for half a game yesterday, reminding the nearby Wakey fans of the number of league points they'd just lost out on as Buderus dived over.

Don't be mistaken that a lot of the teams chasing us are getting better, it is a case that we are sliding back towards their silly mistakes. They're not winning this competition, we have the potential to throw it away ...