Because the replay ended just as you could see riddell lift his left leg...conspiracy theory or what

What the Sky cameras didnt pick up was the whole Wigan team going over to McGuire, performing the riverdance over his body and them setting him alight for a Viking funeral.

Or as I've pointed out on the Wigan board maybe Danny said something to McClennan to make him say that during the interview?

It was Tommy leuleui, fighting with an injured McGuire!

Not very myopic at all, we all saw Sam Tomkins blatantly cheating as well!

Aha! That would explain this then

Jolly decent thing to do given he was ablaze

I'd be interested in seeing the whole incident. Sky seemed to cut it off when Riddell raised his foot. Whether he stamped it down on McGuire or not I have no idea but it did seem that Sky shat themselves when that possibly looked like it could be the case. Hemmings reaction was pure comedy .

The coverage did end rather abruptly.

I hope nothing untoward did happen after Riddell had run all that way to check if McGuire was alright. I've never seen him shift that fast.

Only because sky stopped showing the incident just as riddell raised his foot.

It certainly was strange that SKy went from "lets run the incident"....to a very abrute halt just at the crucial frame which left Wiggy floundering a bit.

My initial reaction was WTF?.... but I guess as there were still a sizeable number of fans still in the ground, and able to view the big screen, that if such a stamping incident had occurred, common sense would dictate that showing it could cause a riot.

It'll all come out in the wash anyway.

Whilst not condoning what McGuire did, that type of foul happens in almost every game and largely goes unnoticed. Coley on McGuire at Headingley?
I suppose in this instance a little bit of rough justice has been served, which, considering McGuire's overall contribution to the game, is unfortunate.

I was too busy watching the ref at the point to see what happened. But there was a lot of booing down below us and screaming at the Wigan player who had gone over, as though something happened after. Maybe that is where McClennan is coming from.

Bluey is reasonably switched on and generally not quick to apportion any blame or make rash post match interview comments. I suspect that something has been said in the dressing room by Danny or some of the other players but it could be that Bluey only got half and they were just complaining about Riddell running over to an injured McGuire. If something has gone on after, then Riddell is going to find himself in all heaps of trouble! I was there and didn't see anything but all eyes were on Alibert!

The vitriol coming from many a Wigan poster and tweeter over the McGuire incident, wishing him injured and so forth, I am very disappointed in. McGuire took Carmont out, plain and simple, it is a penalty and without doubt 10 mins in the bin and even though Danny had left the pitch injured Alibert should still have had the bottle to show him yellow for the record. He did it out of nothing more than passion, mixed with desperation and here is the bit many of the Wigan (so called fans!) are missing, do they really, really think that many a Wigan player would not have done exactly the same thing, if that incident was the other way around? I would have bet my house that both of the Tomkins brothers would have and a whole host of other players on both the Wigan and Leeds sides!

Any Wigan fan that thinks that would have not happened if the boot was on the other foot was kidding themselves and are clearly deluded!