LEEDS - Salford, HKR, Leigh, Batley (H)......Hudds, London, Featherstone (A)

SALFORD - HKR, Hudds, Featherstone, London (H)......Leeds, Leigh. Batley (A)

HKR - Hudds, Leigh, Batley (H)......Leeds, Salford, Featherstone, London (A)

HUDDS - Leeds, Featherstone, London (H).......HKR, Salford, Batley, Leigh (A)

LEIGH - Hudds, Salford, London, Batley (H).....Leeds, HKR, Featherstone (A)

LONDON - Leeds, HKR, Batley, Featherstone (H).....Hudds, Salford, Leigh (A)

BATLEY - Hudds, Salford, Featherstone (H).....Leeds, HKR, Leigh. London (A)

FEATHERSTONE - Leeds, HKR, Leigh (H)......Hudds, Salford, London, Batley (A)

I think we should be fine with those fixtures for middle 8's and we should really win every game, Come on Rhinos do us proud and get back to where we belong next year.

I was a Bradford fan (shudder) I'd be incredibly peed off that my team had just been knocked out of the middle eights by a side with four players on loan from a team who would probably rather play Fev than Bradford in the next stage of competition.

(Of course there's counterpoint that they should have won more games before this weekend, but even so)

Mullally and Golding can only play for one club in the Middle 8s, so I'd be surprised if Leeds let them play for Featherstone.

Baldwinson and Briscoe have gone on loan for the rest of the season, so I'd assume they would be eligible to play against Leeds.

Baldwinson should definitely be allowed to play for Fev as he's basically been their player this year (and last). Can't see Golding playing for them considering he was an unused sub for us this week and making the 19 man squad the week before. Mullally hasn't made the 19 for us for a while but can't risk not having him available if needed if we lose a prop or two later on in the Middle 8's.

With us asking for an away game and Hudds asking away too then that leaves us facing either London or Fev first. Looking at the London board they're worried about getting their ground organised/improved for the larger away following Leeds would bring so they might ask for more time for that fixture so I think we'll be facing Featherstone in the first week.

London's ground at Ealing has a safety certificate for 3,000 people IIRC. Would they need to extend that for a visit from Leeds, given it's a bit of a swine to get to? Probably not, particularly if the game ended up on Sky.

Does part time rugby beckon for the bulls?

Could be, really think super league needs the Bulls back. Franchising sghould have been maintained, Bulls London, and Leigh (sorry fev) Deseve their chance as automatic promotion seems out of touch, unfortunately that would meen wakey (perpetual stragglers with scrap yard for a ground) hull kr, sorry just not cutting the mustard, Salford, cheats,appalling crowds, getting the boot.

Not d all self inflicted.

Should sport by judged on crowds and facilities or just what happens on the field?

You can lament wakefield but they've been in super league 17 seasons with terrible resources. Through franchising, P&R... the lot, they've always done what was needed to stgay in super league and now they are in the super 8's and a CC semi. Doesn't that make them as worthy as anyone？

This is rubbish SL doesn't "need" any of them & like every other club they have to earn that right.
Bulls & London lost their spots on merit also do you not see the irony in calling Salford cheats when the Bulls gained success from cheating.

Ah, flaming nora. We don't even get a trip to Batley?

And I'll be giving London a miss. Too near Wembley weekend, especially with the test coming up later in the year.

Anyone know how Gledhill is?

Time to move in for the Bulls hooker O'Brien. Even if Segs stays (big if) he would be a decent back up.