I think if the game was over after the first 30 wakey were the best team, but we played lots better in 2nd half. I think john was just frustrated at losing, and his team really didn't show anything second half

A 4 for Senior? And a 9 for Peacock?



"David's" awful summary is better than this one, and that is saying something.

A 4 for Senior . ..Yes . On the back of his shirt .

RL is a TEAM sport .
EVERY member of any team is responsible for points gained or conceded .
It is unfair to pick out individuals for a bad performance . If the opposition are scoring against us from inside ten metres it is because the team as a whole let them get that close .

I think a 5/6/7 is justified for Senior depending on how generous you want to be, defensively I agree he had a nightmare but he is still one of our if not our main threat going forward and did some damage tonight so credit where it is due.

Its 'better team'....Leeds are the better team. By your methods, the best team is Wigan.

I didn't notice Wigan on the pitch at the same time as Leeds and Wakefield. Were they out there? I thought they had a game against Huddersfield on the Sunday.

In which match are you referring to when you say "the best team is Wigan"?

Burgess 6 - is to defending what Stevie Wonder is to precision targetting.

Not a bad gag for a bird.

Surprised by the low rating for Senior.

Did'nt most of the tries Leeds scored come down his side? Fair play, Sean Gleeson was little more than a speed bump that side, but you play what is in front of you and when Leeds spread the ball to Senior/Hall, there were always problems for Wakefield.

Haven't you heard, it was his 'poorest performance'





He spoon fed Hall his scores and was the biggest factor in the Buderus match winner. He's had worse days!!!

I watched the game on recording whilst recovering from a hangover and nodded off in parts but I must admit I am not sure what most of our fans are on about. Senior looked like our most potent threat and, as you say, was integral in many of the tries.