I dunno, RS played his hand with Frawley, Mom, Croft, Ackers, Miller, plus a couple of re-signings and projects - and it hasn't worked.

If Arthur can be persuaded to stay, he'll have had a good look at the squad before pre-season with fresh eyes and high standards, and I think he and Blease can work out a plan. We do have talent waiting in the wings so I'd expect us to be more resilient next year. The actual first choice side might be quite similar though, which is a worry.

Whether we get 2x props or 1x prop and 1x back row I don't really mind as long as they're the right standard of player for Leeds. Will that be enough to turn this side into title contenders, with a different coaching and conditioning approach? Not convinced.

If we could bring Kal back in plus 2 good props I wouldn't hate on that. We are going to need another cull after next season though.

Lets have it right though Jim bar Frawley (who in fairness is one of those thats in form) most people were happy with those signings you mention, and I personally still am.

Get some decent forwards in and we’ll look a totally different side.

The mistakes in recruitment were relying on Holroyd as a starting prop snd not adding another big prop.

I don’t think it was a mistake, I think we ran out of quota and cap to bring the right player in. We were sniffing around a couple of players.

Arthur definitely looks to be getting more out of Frawley since he’s come in.

Pack mistakes also extend to contract extensions for sangare (I've no idea what the club saw in him to make that signing in the first place) and lisone and Bentley and Donaldson (though Im on the fence with him as he'll not be on much and you need some players like that in your squad). Compound that with singing Goudemand and we're left with naming holroyd at 10 Which given his appearance record and lack of fulfilling his early promise was a massive gamble. Of all the project signings too only McDonnell has worked out.

Might nit be popular but Ive no issue with Donna being around - he will be on a small wage and he is the type of player that can help drive attitudes and standards.

Lisone is a luxury player and one that we cannot afford at the moment.

Something jus isn't right with the whole Holroyd thing IMO, hasn't he had a couple of scrapes with players in the past - I'm just not sure if his attitude is where it needs to be, but that's just speculation on my part. Which would be a shame as he does have potential.

I wouldn't be surprised to see the pack totally overhauled in the off season, Mike is carrying them and has for a couple of seasons, he needs help urgently.

Agree Chris. Though i think a mistake was not having enough cap space to sort it..

Due diligence is absolutely correct.
Whoever identified the players presumably Smith. Then who is it who runs the rule over them to make sure they are what we require or once the coach says get me so and so it`s down to GH to negotiate the contract?
McDonnel like what`s been said is probably the only one to come out with any credit.
Bentley would go ok with a bigger pack but not with what we have now.
Martin will be a miss more so for his 80% kicking success.
So we now need to find a kicker that isn`t Miller!
With the players we currently have in our squad and the length of some of their contracts I doubt we will see us in the top 4 for another 3 years even with BA.

Would you look to exit Lisone if the club do decide to pay off contracted players? On Saturday I would have willingly lit the fuse that would have shot him out of a very large cannon, but he does offer a lot more than Sangare (not hard) and the more props we try and get the harder it will be to get good ones. No easy answers.

If we're looking at moving contracted players on I'd look at moving Sangare on before Lisone, who as you say can actually add something. We need IMO two extra decent starting grade props minimum.