Probably still the best we've got.

Against NZ and Australia I thought that when Hill and Graham both went off, we lost some grunt and momentum.

Thought all the Burgess lot disappointed.

I asked you to give me a viable alternative, imo you gave laughable ones. I said Watkins was as poor as anyone in a struggling Leeds team that frankly most backs would have struggled to stand out in. Imo it's a case of Watkins being the best of an average at best bunch to choose from, i'm not at all saying i can't look past Watkins but until a better option presents itself he is the best hope we have i'm afraid.

Atkins is the poor man's Watkins. Both go missing more than you'd like but talent-wise the latter stands head and shoulders over the former. IMO of course.

No worries there, SKD was dreadful today.

SKD is a grade A Donkey, capable of winning you a game, but far, far more likely doing something stupid.

The W makes all the difference.