These were the Wilkinson & Cook legacy, a crop of world class kids

Exactly and proper coaches. Which followed Dean Bell and Daryl Powell.

And in response to rhinoms. When was John Bastian appointed Head of Youth Development? When did Wilkinson the last one before him leave?

Our only ones ready at this moment are Watkins, Allen, McShane. Not the ones rhinoms mentions, and Ambler was from Salford, from the Halifax service area. Watkins is from the Manchester service area.

Where are all the Leeds service area stars? dont tell me they dont exist. I spent years watching junior rugby and there was potential stars year on year on year in the Leeds service area alone. They do exist, and we are not bringing them through like we used to.

DISA,

You like a good moan don't you?

I think the Bulls would be a good team for you to follow. You'd be climaxing with the amount they have to whinge about.

Is this really a thread you should be commenting on? You know bugger all about juniors or their development. Stick to first team spin from the club, its your only source of information it appears.

If that is a criteria for posting delete your username and sell your PC as you know bugger all about anything, misery guts.

I bet thats not your worst insult of the day.

I don't think it's that simple - these things are always fairly cyclic IMHO.

Look at football - you have Manchester United who have the best resources in the world for junior development and poach kids from all over the world and yet they don't manage to produce new stars every year (at best they probably get 1-2 every three years). Also like Leeds they produce a lot more players that ultimately go on to play in the lower leagues or at 'lesser' sides.

I don't want to pish on your fire mate, and at lest you have come up with something constructive, but the Man U argument is a myth, and simply not true.

They continually produce the players ready, it is just felt they are not as good as the stars they already have in the team. you can only play 11 players at a time, and they have many more than that regarded as world stars. How many players do you think Man U have out on loan at any one time? They even have feeder clubs in 3 seperate countries in order to accomodate the production line.

Lets not move the goalposts.

The standard you applied to Leeds was that we should be able to produce "a future star" every year.

Apply this same standard to Manchester United and my argument is sound.

Man United currently have about 6 players in their main squad of about 20 that came from their youth team...three of these are in their 30's. Take their first 30 or so players and you can probably double this number - but given that the range of ages is about 20 years that's still way below a player a year. Also remember that this includes a "freak crop" from the early 90's

Luckily for you I'm very busy this week so I may not be around much to keep you and the other assorted fekkwitts in check, or insult you.

Have fun in my absence.

Nope. I think Leeds with the service area size they have should be producing "future stars" every year.

Of course your not going to produce a Andy Farrell, Adrian Morley, Kevin Sinfield, Danny McGuire, James Roby, etc, each year.

But there is absolutely not excuse for not producing the next Carl Ablett, Luke Burgess, Gareth Hock, Paul Clough, Ryan Atkins, etc. These players are out there in the service area. Players who are better than these at similar ages. Its how we are developing them through the system now that is the problem.

Lets put it another way, if it was as cyclic as you say, then the emphasis on a club to remain challengers would be to go through stages, of produce, buy, produce, buy. The aim of having a dominant team produced from homegrown players is simply a pipe dream then? It would never happen.