www.rugbyleague.com/rugby-league ... -2010.html

www.rugbyleague.com/rugby-league ... -2010.html

here we go, some more bull ,

Some rule changes, just make our game boring, it will be tig and pass next to make the calling of held quicker. I always got tought that running is impossible without the legs, however now the game seems to want as little contact as possible with the legs. If it means lifting a players leg in order to put him down then let it be, dont see how its dangerous!!!

It's only when the player is stationary isn't it? so it stops what Hudds were doing last year by holding a player up, then when 4-5 players are in the tackle, putting them on the floor, that's a penalty under these new rules.

dont think new interpretations will bring anything to the game..just penalising good defence. Why not change somthing for the good like not restarting the tackle count if attacking team retreve ball after charge down.this also punishes good defence in my opinion the tackle count should just carry on. WHY MAKE THE GAME FASTER WHEN REFS CAN'T KEEP UP ANYWAY

If it can clean up a grey area in the rules then I'm in favour. At the moment with dragging the player into touch teams are sometimes penalised for it and sometimes not. At least this way teams now know what they can do and not have to rely on which ref they get.

The other rule makes sense as well. It just stops a team from hopping a player around the field.

Paradox
so you tackling a bloke near to the line and then for some reason the player leg lifts up in the air, the ref only sees one leg up and calls held, the player did it himself, is this not another grey area ?

is it true its now an offence to complain about a forward pass at headingley ??