Congratulations, you've made up a word Firefox doesn't even have a suggestion for what it's supposed to be, that takes a special kind of stupid.

Secondly, this is why the Cas board needs more mods, it's been over run by Wakey trolls, you do know you have your own board right?

Not to mention your constant berating of Cas is now becoming borderline libellous, pack it in





There we go, had the dictionary out have we?

Why would I turn it into an anti Wakefield thread,you are the first to mention it.

Changed it I see.

Is that a grade of tights?

I'm flattered that you took the time to look it up. I toyed with both denyer, as in someone who denies things, and denier, but that is easily confused with denier, as in tights. It is however, the correct spelling.

I would have hoped that Firefox\would have a suggestion, e.g. as in holocaust denier.

And nothing I have put is baiting, berating or trolling. And it is certainly not libelous (with 1 L if we're playing the spelling game).

And 007, do not say "what holocaust?!"

Concept is this,"Incident" happens after Leeds game,all of a sudden seven days later another "incident" appears,which hasn't been heard of by anyone except a Wakefield supporter and his father,kippers anyone?

Keep up. Marshman did that.

Just to have my little input on the whole assaults issue. I can tell you now, in the hours after the match no assaults were reported to the police. Fact!

1 L? Firefox begs to differ there...

As for trolling and libel....making up incidents like you have is in fact, both now jog on, you're boring me now.





Now now, don't let facts get in the way of this little troll and his pathetic attempts to make up incidents so his doomed team can have a slight chance of staying up.

I wont,its something a little closer to home than you could know.

your post was aimed at me.

You stated, as a FACT, that it didn't happen. You don't know that though, do you?

You don't know that it did, but that's not the same.

This one will you up too - the Earth goes round the Sun!

Putting "FACT!" in a post does not make it, ya know, a fact.

No 007, it is in response to this post by MM.

A post before one of mine states that no incidents were reported to the police after the game ,heres one for you "knowing that you're beaten is not a sign of weakness,it's knowing that you need to try harder next time"

How hard is this!?

The person who posted that is who exactly? How do they know?

How do you know they know? Do you know that person and know how they will know such information?

I would imagine they must be the Duty Sgt at Cas cop shop, from that night. Or maybe Wood St.

Is it just because they put "fact" in their post?

And that "saying" doesn't make sense either!

If your IQ is under 60, as yours quite evidently is, then I can see why you'd struggle to comprehend that saying, or that you've never of heard of it.

I haven't, and be honest, you haven't either have you?

Google and Bing haven't.

It would make a bit more sense if it said that "it's a sign that you need to try harder", but even then it's ropey.

Can you show me where it exists (apart for yours and 007's head)?

And intelligence quotient of 60??? Please, behave!

I googled "Gaslight & 007" and this is what came up;

"It’s so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and then don’t say it.

Being stupid is its own reward"

I don't need to be a duty sergeant to know that. Im a 'plastic pig' as most will know us, but the information is there for us to read on morning briefings ect.

Cool. At last someone who bases THEIR opinion on something they know, rather than something they don't.

Of course, what we know now is that it wasn't reported or a complaint made, not that it didn't happen (don't forget, I have no idea whether it did or didn't). And that is an actual fact.

Would have been remotely funny if it came from someone who hadn't proven themselves to be the stupidest person to come onto this board in a long time, you're just embarrassing yourself now so I'd give up before you make yourself look even more daft.

As for being stupid, I think my degree alone would show that, once again, you're wrong.



Oh, so now that because you know your made up incident didn't happen, nobody reported it, even though you yourself said hundreds of people saw it? Now you've stooped to new levels of stupidity, seriously, that is pathetic and you should just give up now.

This is like fishing with dynamite.

1. YOU said my IQ was below 60 - not me about you.

2. Stupid people don't have degrees?

3. Where have I said I saw alleged incident?? You say you didn't see it therefore it didn't happen.

4. If you have a degree, you MUST be capable of synthesis of thought - you would understand that because it wasn't reported, it doesn't mean it didn't occur.

5. I do not believe you have a degree. And if you have you bought it.

And I'm still waiting to know where the "saying" can be found.

So let me get this straight, hundreds of people saw the incident, yet NONE of them reported it?

Think this through, are you saying that all these people saw a violent assault on an innocent man, did nothing about it at the time, nor reported it to the police either?

Wow