Not a fan of DR for sake of it and not a fan of resting players after just 2 league games.Got what we deserved although with the squad i accept the argument for it occurring.Still feel a bit cheated,wanted a run in this cup and wouldnt have bothered travelling knowing the club weren't embracing it 100%.

BTW Lachlan Walmsley was in our end...read into that whatever..

The start killed us they came out of the blocks with a point to prove with some intent about there play, from then on we was playing catch up which is high risk rugby. We did score some easy on the eye scores but we got what we deserved over the 80 minutes. Resting woody, crooks, and Douglas didn't help and for me and i keep saying it Woodburn-hall needs to be at fullback and  Louis back at 6. Woodburn-hall is better under the highball and as more physical presence when returning kicks. It was interesting watching Kyles interactions with the players from the touchline in the second half he was constantly talking and giving directions to the young half from saints and wasn't best pleased when Dixon lost the ball on the first tackle after we had just scored he did not look a happy bunny. Ingham went off for a HIA and didn't return so will be missing on sunday and if Kyles reactions pitch side are anything to go by he will not be the only change next week he could use even more players on DR.

Terry has covered pretty much my take on the game , I think the additions of Douglas,  woody n crooks could be enough to tip the balance in our favour,  not sure what the territory and set for set statistics were but we had very little possession in there half . It'll be interesting to see how the inman conundrum is solved,  jouffret to hooker woody back at FB and a dr half , restall to FB.  Looks like there maybe some consequences for the scuffles.