Quote ="littlerich"So we should just spend for the sake of spending to reach the cap - like in Fastasy Rugby League games? If the club thinks they've got the squad needed to compete, why do they have to spend to the cap limit? I applaud them for buying quality, not quantity in this respect because for a club spending below the cap, we've some bloody excellent bargains. You need to take your gloomy hat off Florimo and have a bit of faith in those running the club. Would you rather they followed Leigh or Doncaster's example this year?'"
But hasnt it been painfully obvious, even before this sticky patch struck, that we needed one or two players. With so much to spend you would think we might of brought those one or two in.
Realistically come 2011 and say you have us and Widnes competing for SL. Both have nice stadiums decent youth set ups etc etc. But one of them shows they have the means to spend quite a decent chunk of the SL salary cap limit. Who is getting the nod? Afterall big Nige has stated publically that he expects all SL clubs to be spending up to the maximum limit of the salary cap.
However i do say well done to the club if we are only spending 250K because we have obviously found a bit of a way round the salary cap.
'"
