Jail time needed for this vile racist cow. If she'd had said anything similar about Jews you'd never see her face on TV again and she'd be behind bars quick style. www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-n ... ng-4608922

Jail time needed for this vile racist cow. If she'd had said anything similar about Jews you'd never see her face on TV again and she'd be behind bars quick style. www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-n ... ng-4608922

That woman really has no redeeming features

Self publicist generating publicity in her trademark style, its how it works although she probably does hold those views too, and so will others.

If people ignored her she'd probably go away. Unfortunately the UK celebrity culture has bred an obsessional disease whereby anyone who's had anywhere near their 15 minutes of fame is elevated to such star status that it all seems legit for them to be where they are and earning what they earn.

Having a relation and his wife who are dependent on the celebrity circus to earn their livings then I concur, but more than this there are so many "celebrity" news sources available to them today that when monthly income is looking a bit weak for the next quarter they can simply recycle an old story or even invent a "marriage hits rocks" page filler and tout it around for the best price - my relation did exactly this three months ago in Woman magazine where a story of their "marriage hits rocks" was recycled from a three year old biography and related to a period five years ago, but was presented as an exclusive as if it was current news.

Nice earner for everyone from a gullible public, and it has to be said, mainly aimed at the female market.

She really is a nasty piece of work.

Freedom of speech isn't it?

'I may not like what she says....' etc etc

This. It's fair to say, though, that social media, which thrives on shoiite like Hopkins regularly regurgitates, is infested in outlandish numbers by subhuman nasty pieces of work. Of course, all these people were always out there, but had no means of releasing their excrement to a wide audience. Now, though, you can troll and abuse the bereaved, the sick and the dying at will. We have a dumbed-down population which feeds on the 21c phenomenon of "celebrity", devouring utter dross like the minutiae of the lives of nonentities like Kim Kardashian. Banality reigns, and 'adults' waste whole swathes of their lives playing meaningless childish games and offering up semi-literate half-baked drivel as if anyone else wanted to hear it.

Scumbags like Hopkins have just cynically found a way to actually be paid for being just one more big mouthed, vile shhit-stirring asshole. And she probably even holds some of those views in real life.

Somebody has tweeted a page from her diary

I believe she made reference to those Palestinians digging tunnels (quite obviously with a view to terrorist activity) as filthy rodents.

I agree she is a poop stirring asshole, but I don't think she has crossed the line to inciting racial hatred or anything.

Amazing how many people champion free speech, then kick off when someone says something they don't like.

I think people champion responsible free speech.

If anybody dare tweet "Israeli's busy bombing Palestinians. 2 state solution my . Filthy rodents overrunning Palestine. Time to restart the gassing" I'm pretty sure there would be an investigation for racism.

I doubt that very much - the idea that nothing can ever be said against Israeli and the Jews is fantasy of the highest order. If you have any examples bring them to the table?

Back on topic whilst people will continue to buy these magazines this rubbish will continue to be printed. It is no different to what you read in the editorials of all our major newspapers - the difference is the quality of the language.

Racial slurs is OK is it ?