Given that it looks like we're on the verge of YET ANOTHER full-scale Israeli offensive against the embargoed, besieged people of Gaza I think it's worth recalling a few statistics from the last Israeli incursion in 2008 (figures drawn from the UNHRC Goldstone Report):

1,400 Palestinians dead. Four fifths were civilians. 358 were children.

Number of Israelis killed - THIRTEEN. Ten of which were combatants and half were the victims of friendly fire.

For every Israeli killed ONE HUNDRED Palestinians lost their lives.
For every single Israeli civilian killed FOUR HUNDRED Palestinians died.

That's the inevitable result of being stupid enough to pick a fight with some one enormously more powerful than you.

The regimes of Nazi germany and Stalinist Russia saw millions and millions die. Many more than the British and American regimes.

Are we supposed to see the British and American regimes as the aggressors of WW2 simply because the loss of life on their sides was vastly less than the loss of lives elsewhere?

Is there some sort of point there?

Two words:

"Proportional response".

Let's look at what really happened"possible cime against humanity"[/i.

[i"A flagrant violation of international law" [/i- according to Amnesty International

[i"Gaza's whole civilisation has been destroyed. I am not exaggerating. Its whole civilisation has been destroyed"[/i - former human rights commissioner - Mary Robinson (after her visit).

June 2008 - An Israel Hamas ceasefire brokered by Egypt. Each side had obligations. Palestinians - cease rocket and mortar attacks. Israel - gradually lift the blockade (a flagrant violation of international law).

According to the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs [i"Hamas was careful to maintain the ceasefire. There were some rogue terrorist organisations - but not Hamas". "Hamas enforced the ceasefire on the rogue terrorist organisations with a great deal although not total success!".[/i

Israel, however, reneged on lifting the blockade.

What happened nextWE ARE READY TO RENEW THE CEASEFIRE, BUT Israel has to lift the illegal blockade.

December - Sarah Roy - [i"The breakdown of an entire society is happening in front of us. But there is little international response beyond UN warning which are ignored".[/i

Hamas then had two options: Succumb to starvation or resist. They chose the latter (although largely symbolic).

I find it interesting you specify how flagrant a breach of international law the blockade is, yet no mention of the legality of the attempted murder of civilians via terrorist activities.

Has anyone else spotted the "co-incidence", BTW?

I didn't - Goldstone (a widely respected WC jurist and, interestingly, - a Jew) & AA did.

Are they there with you? Cos im pretty sure you typed that, and you didnt quopte this [iJune 2008 - An Israel Hamas ceasefire brokered by Egypt. Each side had obligations. Palestinians - cease rocket and mortar attacks. Israel - gradually lift the blockade (a flagrant violation of international law) [/isooooooooo

You do understand that rocket attacks are against individuals (even though Israel admitted Hamas cracked down on militant groups) whilst a blockade hurts every single Palestinian in Gaza? You are aware of the current "living" conditions in Gaza because of that blockade?

And you think that's a commensurate response? I'd expect someone from the Waffen SS to argue this point in relation to the Warsaw Ghetto, BTW.

At the end of the day Hamas are a terrorist organisation and so their democratic right to power is somewhat limited. They really shouldn't be allowed in the vote, given their actions.

Israel by plenty.

Really? Which individuals are they aimed against? Do we have a list of names? If so they really should be released before hand so everyone else can go about their day without worrying they might be killed or maimed by, what up until today, was thought to be indiscriminate rocket and mortar fire.

The Palestinian rocket and mortar fire aimed at civilians, is also a flagrant breach of international law, you can't condemn Israel for breaching international law, but sympathise with the Palestinians for doing so.

Really? I know 'smart weapons' have come a long way but I had no idea that they were that sophisticated. What target discrimination system do they use? How is the blast radius constrained?