I am getting concerned about Standee's mental health. Is he under some form of extreme pressure? His posts of late are suggestive of that. Seriously, if anyone knows him personally please keep an eye on him.

different people have different motivation, if it wasn't for those that did seek wealth then who would emply the unambitious and poorly educated masses, TESCO, AMAZON, VODAFONE, VIRGIN, M&S where all born out of aspiration for wealth, and they employ a shed load of people. (granted successive governments have given them tax breaks, but again, what the f'k did Labour do about it?)

But hey, let's be fair and equal, we can all eat cabbage and water, nobody need strive to develop themselves, so long as we're all miserable then that is fair and equitable.

What's wrong with that? Why does aspiration have to be extravagant? I think if you asked most people, in the world, what their aspiration is and they would say to be happy first before being rich.

Why not respond to his specific points, rather than making one sweeping statement. That's how debate is supposed to work, you know.

My favourite ever Dally post.

my mental health is fine, thanks, I don't hate people based on their sexuality, I dont hate people because I worship a sky pixie.

now, why not post some links to some more Daily Mail lies so we can deride you and laugh at you, or have you had enough of that.

(is this where you call me a bully?)

what is the point, Kosh has his viewpoint (as do you and many others) it's their right to hold it, I don't agree, I think the country has become far too socilaist and, thankfully, that is being changed, I am a firm believer in survival of the fittest, you don't agree, but I doubt very much you'll convince me to change my opinion.

some people are more worthwhile than others, it's just the way it is (as I see it)

Gosh. I don't really know where to go with that. What a horrible thing to say.

you've never really been good at grasping reality.

there are some people on this planet that offer no benefit to those around them, it's a sad and simple fact, h/s are the only species who ignore survival of the fittest.

in fact, it's the least fit that procreate the most

We are getting close to Third Reich mentality now. Do you think you'd have been a more caring sharing individual if your sperm count hadn't been so low?

just what we've come to expect from you

So do you think we should just allow the weaker members of our species to die of their own accord, or should we help them on their way? We could maybe bomb a few council estates. Though picking them off with rifles would probably be more entertaining.

That's the second time you've mentioned something along these lines. I suggest you do a little more research into biology/zoology before making such sweeping statements.

no thanks, I'm quite happy to have confidence in my opinion, and not to be a bore like you.

I'll leave the usual sanctamonious prats to it, Sin Bin never changes, blah blah blah, anyone with a bit of cash should pay for me being useless, pay for my kids education and look after me, afterall, they were all born into it, none of them have earned it on merit.

sad, sad envious bunch of people.