Maybe Jamie Jones-Buchanan is Jesus? His second coming is overdue, is it not?

Jamie Jones-Buchanan THINKS that he is Jesus - there is a difference.

As we well know, in matters of religion the burden of proof is reversed. It's therefore up to you to either prove that he's not Jesus, or begin worshipping him.

I saw him pick his nose once, surely the new Jesus wouldn't do that ?

Hmm. There could be something in that. If JC's last visit was J(A) then his second coming could be J(B). It would not take much digging to deduce that JC(A) could thus be unearthed as JC(B).

One doubt occurred, if JJB is in fact JCB, why does he play like a wtat, but then I realised that could be just demonstrating the human fallibility thing, so who knows?

Perhaps you could ask kirkstaller if it's the same guy that comes round for tea?

Kirkstaller strikes me as one of those Christians that imagines a white Jesus. In fact, don't they all imagine that?

As long as he didn't eat it, he could still be the Messiah.

That snot necessarily true.

Nope, my mistake. It was Jamie Jones-Buchanan after all. I mean Jesus' head would never be that shape.

But I did meet Jesus in another deep spiritual interaction, he said that Kirkstaller has it all wrong. Evolution is true, creationism is incorrect and it's just plain silly to take the bible literally and not apply its teachings to modern standards.
He said that the whole point of him going around doing good deeds was to try and inspire other people to also do good deeds, not blindly follow some ised interpretation of what he was trying to do or to take his teachings and tales as literal but as metaphors for how someone should live their life.
Basically he said that you only need to live by the bit that says "treat others as you would wish to be treated" and you'll do fine and fulfill his goal of trying to make things better.

Now I don't believe a word these so-called "scientists" say about evolution and the big bang and what have you, but I have faith in Jesus. So there. Conclusive proof, backed up with incontrovertible evidence.

[url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-school-at-the-centre-of-cruise-split-7904497.htmlKatie Holmes: I don't want my child to be brainwashed by Scientology. I want her to be brainwashed by Catholicism instead.[/url

Harrumph. I prefer Newsthump's explanation.
[urlhttp://newsthump.com/2012/07/02/tom-cruise-divorce-papers-cite-irreconcilable-difference-as-holmes-lack-of-penis[/url

That is rather good.

I'll be watching JJB very closely this evening for signs of divinity.

His party trick is turning wine into pi[is[/is

I don't know if you noticed, but he and his team were crucified by the Exiles.

It's not just the schools, they've infiltrated [url=http://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2012/07/national-trust-promotes-creationism-at-new-visitor-centreThe National Trust[/url now.

That's the last penny the Trust will see from me

I hope they give as much credence to the story of Finn the Giant and his pavement to Scotland as they do the Creationist explanation, it has as much legitimacy although the Giant story doesn't have quite the same amount of comic value.

Me too.
Well, almost.
He told me the bible was nowt to do with him or his dad and was written by human beings.
He said that him and his dad wished we'd all be nice to each other, it would make a nice change.

Indeed, likewise I'll not be giving them any of my cash in a hurry.

That's put me off taking my family to St Michaels Mount on our summer holiday.

I've joined the Facebook group protesting against this.

[url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/national-trust-in-giants-causeway-creationism-row-7917687.htmlReport in The Indy[/url

Sounds like country suppers or tory donors all over again

Was about to join the National Trust in time for the school holidays. Will find something else to do now.

As I understand it, the information which is being conveyed at the centre states that some Young Earth Creationists believe that the Causeway was formed in this fashion. That statement is factually correct, many YECs do believe that. The centre is not saying that such a view is correct or is scientifically sound.

Like much of what the NSS bleats on about, it's a big hoo-haa over nothing.