Now that the Tory machine have dumped their electoral disaster, Lyin Boris, (maybe)

The grunts are now jockeying for pole position to succeed him, with Suella Braverman already saying she’s interested.
Bookies have Ben Wallace as early favourite

Gormless Gove an outside bet

Why would you not throw your hat in the ring as a Tory MP? Straight in as PM and not exactly a tough act to follow.

Sunak and Javid resigned, they need a clear run to number 10.

The Brains Truss?
Mad Nad?
The Mogg?

Let's be honest, these three fit a couple of the key criteria:
- They are so self unaware that they might actually think they have the intellect and ability to do the job
- Tory members are so unhinged that they might actually vote for them in the leadership election

Absent a win by any of them I think we can say goodbye to all of them in the cabinet going forward under relative heavyweights like Wallace or Tugendhat. Johnson's chaotic and unstable administration was hallmarked by him surrounding himself with idiots and inadequates.

I want Ben Wallace as he’s my local MP and personally stepped in when my step daughter, who was relocating, didn’t get the school that was on her door step. Not only that, he moved on a load of “travellers” that the local council and inept police force had failed to do for months

Did you vote for him in the last general election?

I remember the days when the EU referendum was going to fix internal divisions within the Conservative party...

I didn’t actually vote in the last election!

A bit like me then

It appears to be who can promise more tax cuts, public spending squeeze, supporting Brexit and sending asylum seekers to Rwanda or maybe somewhere else. The latter may become even more of a problem because Rwanda is currently being threatened with military action.
There is of course no mention of how they will pay for this but currently they are only appealing to their colleagues in the commons.

Referring to my previous post to jukesay and not to you regarding my less knowledgeable outcome regarding politics, this post of your is it factual or simply hearsay, innuendos and half truths, because your opening sentence doesn't seem to say anything truthful only it appears, which if your honest is not very forthcoming and hints of a bit of mischief making, is there any wonder nobody believes a word you say, surely wouldn't you agree it would be better to leave out stuff like that and wait for the truth, unless you your just guessing so that you can claim insider knowledge and be the first to say you heard it here first.

Sorry you are wrong again because each candidate has given one or more of these topics in their opening pitch to gain votes. I wouldn’t trust what they say but it does not mean they have not said them however, why do you think it is hearsay in your world of questionable neutrality.
I wish you would read before you post because your attempts to try to embarrass me is becoming just too easy to disprove which makes you appear clueless in what goes on outside your fish tank in the big clear world.

Just three simple words, It would appear hth, to me that states hearsay and nothing else in my world, I also wouldn't trust what any politician says and on the strength of that unlike you I wouldn't use that against anybody just to justify my innuendos against them, funnily enough I don't attempt to embarrass you as you do a perfectly good job of doing it yourself with your endless lies, want me to post a few, thanks to you I have the most famous fish tanks on here, hope your not jealous cos your garden gnomes don't get a mention, anyway It's teatime so I won't be replying, you can have the last say again, I'd like to say it's been interesting.

Does every thread have to go this way?