Yes

In a word, no.

You shouldn't be given a reward for losing, in my opinion.

I hate it personally, as ESO says, it rewards failure

So using the old 2-1-0 system you could have five teams that fail to win a game yet some of them will be "rewarded" for scoring more or conceding less points (or both) than the others. The reward being escape from relegation.

Thanks for your input, sorry the link didn't work. I'll try it again www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... mpionship/ Cheers

Thanks for your input, sorry the link didn't work. I'll try it again www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... mpionship/ Cheers

If memory serves me right, and at my age that is dubious to say the least

I think that not so many seasons ago, thanks to the bonus point system, the Eagles scored league points in every league game.

Correct, despite losing half of our games.

We didn't deserve to finish where we did that season, a loss is a loss in my opinion, I don't take any pleasure by losing by less than 12.

Yes. Because it differentiates between teams who get battered every week and teams who may lose but are trying to compete and not throw in the towel.

Compared to the 2-1-0 system ? No it doesn't. You get two points more for winning than losing, just the same.

Going back to the old system would reward clubs who get stuffed

- they'd be the only teams to gain from it.

Why do you want to do that, Doctor ?

I don't really care, it doesn't make that much difference anyway.

My system would be:

3 points for a win in regulation
1 point for a draw, but the game goes into golden point extra time and the winner picks up an extra point
0 points for a loss in regulation