sorry tb but i just cant take anything they say at face value anymore.
i was hoping for some figures?

Can't disclose, as it is obviously confidential information, you can choose to believe it or not, but I can a) asure you it's true and b) vouch for the source and his connection to this matter.
I can also add that the rfl did not even try and play hard ball with the crusaders, as they had far more to lose than any £700k should the purchasers of the crusaders pull out, and both partys and o'hara's knew this.
Put it down to bravado on all sides, but as I stated earlier, not shocked or surprised.

And i can tell RLFans exclusively that The moon is made out of cheese, The earth is actually a cube and Rugby Union is a great sport to watch.....
Obviously i can't disclose my source as it would risk his position within the BS society but I can a) assure you it's true and b) vouch for the source and his connection to this matter.

That's your perogative.

LUCKY BUGGERS ! (3rd time lucky ???) YES, YOU WILL NEVER KICKED OUT, WE (RL) NEED YOU !!

Or unsubstantiated gossip as its otherwise know. OK.

Nothing like guesswork tb



Where exactly does it say in there that they are paying back the RFL? Come on now, certain liabilities does not translate to we are repaying the RFL in full or in part or not at all. Not like you to make assumptions tb, you usually have 'solid proof'

you think that the RFL and Crusaders were seeking an agreement over the liabilities to Brewery Field? weird.

Your weird pal, WTF are you talking about. Who gives a toss about Brewery field, its a dump.

Will they be repaying the £700k they owe the RFL? Like I said I don't give a monkeys about anything else although I think the creditors might. Thats 700k that could have gone to grass roots RL or Championship clubs, or even SL clubs.

Why would the rfl give the CHAMPIONSHIP any money? Do we exist? Acording to most sl speccies we do'nt. Thats why there is no continuity between the leagues.

Indeed. So you accept that it clearly was the money owed to the RFL they were talking about when Wood said "they agree with the need to deal properly with certain liabilities and to their credit have made provision to do so" and your "Where exactly does it say in there that they are paying back the RFL?" is, at best, mischef making

You think your quite clever TB, you try and tie people up on knots by not actually answering questions that have been asked, just what you think has been asked. How can I accept it was the money owed to the RFL they were talking about, it doesn't specifically state that. Lets say it was, the statement 'provision to do so' is woolly at best. Messrs Roberts and Moss I would say are in no position to pay the RFL 700k, if they were Wrexham FC would not be playing in the league they are in at the moment.

You have not answered the question....again. Where does it say it? Nowhere. It doesn't?

So if having money is the solution to getting what you want how come Man City are not winning everything? Might it be more to do with the fact that there are people with more money running other clubs rather than Moss having none?

But surely, you must have enough money to run the business/club in the first place.
£2M in two years for any club is a bit on fekkin massive side?

well you come back with the exact terms of the repayment, and I'll take you more serious than my source.
But I think you will find that, based on the fact that you think that the crusaders are paying back £700k to what is an unlawful major creditor, very difficult?