I see your still bitter from us beating you the other week

I think we raise the educational standards in Superleague. That much is obvious from your post.

Don't tell me you missed the English class at school where they did such choice words as 'an, wat u and com' jannerboy?

Thinking about it there are times when we've only taken












two points from Wigan spring to mind

I'd just like to say that I'm against a club with a low average attendance, backed by a "sugar daddy" playing in a run down ground being put into SL through the franchise system, rather than winning promotion on the pitch.

Anyway, that's enough about Salford, this is the Crusaders board after all.

Salford won National League one, under the old rules they would have gone up anyway.

you thick in bred pie eating moron, you give the human race a bad name never mind wigan!

Could you translate that into English? I don`t speak Klingon.

i think he's speaking phonetically tha nose

As a sceptic about all things SL/RFL at the mo, it's posts like this that tend to ruin the argument for us "sceptical miserable bug_bers!

Back up your point, argue your stand, evidence what you are saying and I'll shout as loud! As it is, your making thi sen look a bot of a tool!

Celtic finished 2nd, so in a season when we were expanding to 14 teams, they'd have gone up as well.

You will never have an average of 10,000 seats as long as I have a whole in my !!!!!

Fingerposts, you ar in fact an !

err a whole hole?

Indeed they would.

But the point was that Salford only won their SL slot through licensing, this is not correct, had automatic promotion and relegation been in play they would have gone up anyway.

Crusaders would have been losing finalists and would have stayed in NL1 in any other year.