i wonder if rfl will tell crusaders the same as they told Blackpool that they cant go into administration & get ride of all debt & come back in the league debt free i dont think so because its a super league club !!! if rfl really are wanting to expanding the game why were Blackpool not aloud to renter the league debt free like other clubs have been aloud to do !!!!

Indeed. So you accept that it clearly was the money owed to the RFL they were talking about when Wood said "they agree with the need to deal properly with certain liabilities and to their credit have made provision to do so" and your "Where exactly does it say in there that they are paying back the RFL?" is, at best, mischef making

You think your quite clever TB, you try and tie people up on knots by not actually answering questions that have been asked, just what you think has been asked. How can I accept it was the money owed to the RFL they were talking about, it doesn't specifically state that. Lets say it was, the statement 'provision to do so' is woolly at best. Messrs Roberts and Moss I would say are in no position to pay the RFL 700k, if they were Wrexham FC would not be playing in the league they are in at the moment.

You have not answered the question....again. Where does it say it? Nowhere. It doesn't?

So if having money is the solution to getting what you want how come Man City are not winning everything? Might it be more to do with the fact that there are people with more money running other clubs rather than Moss having none?

But surely, you must have enough money to run the business/club in the first place.
£2M in two years for any club is a bit on fekkin massive side?

well you come back with the exact terms of the repayment, and I'll take you more serious than my source.
But I think you will find that, based on the fact that you think that the crusaders are paying back £700k to what is an unlawful major creditor, very difficult?