Quote: marvwoodburn "I agree, but if France played Wales, and England played a select side possibly then there would be one more international, not less.'"
No, that's still one international
Quote: marvwoodburn "It isnt is it, France have had a few pull outs from the Dragons, and who can blame them, the seasons tough enough already as it is and France are looking like getting another beating, gaining little from it in the process. Christ Bobbys even had a number of LER players pull out.'"
You’ll see players pulling out of international fixtures when ever they’re played- it is indeed a tough old season.
France gain a place in the international calendar from it; their only fixture against Big Three opposition this year
Quote: marvwoodburn "England have dragged three players needlessly round the world and could win the game with a third choice side.'"
It's up to Steve McNamara ain't it. He picks the team.
Flying those guys over makes an important point about the prestige of the international game.
Quote: marvwoodburn "Thirdly and most importantly England will gain so little from this that game that will be beneficial in the 4N its not funny.'"
I can’t agree that a mid season fixture doesn’t aid preparation for an end of season series. The players get to know each other’s games and the coaches get to see what they’re working with but the main point here is that it’s not all about preparing England for the inevitable thrashing against Australia. In that regard, there’s an element of urinating in the wind there what ever we’re doing with the England team. Playing these games- however one sided their outcome may be- helps to develop an international programme. This is essential for the future growth of the game in my view.