no good asking any of the cabbages, there's some severe alzheimer cases going on in the west, they can't seem to remember anything pre KC!

Ooh, hark at her!

Councils are strapped for cash. As stated, if there is such a proven need for community facilities in East Hull I'm sure it will already be high up the council's priority list, so let them appraise potential locations against a set of community, accessibility and and financial criteria.

Still, you side-stepped Hudgell's image rights "rationale" quite neatly there.

The name of the KC has nack all to do with the revenue used to build it. Kingston Comms have a 10 year sponsorship deal with it. The windfall was taxpayers money which the council chose to squander on all manner of dumb projects - you should see the cash wasted on council house gates/fences etc around parts of the city.

Rovers turned down the chance to play there for 1 reason only - location. Had it been built centrally it would have been a worthwhile consideration.

Debt doesn't have to be paid back, just ask the former creditors of hull kr who had to accept a CVA not so long back.

The interest rate on directors loans is capped I believe at a much lower rate than current bank rate would likely be, plus is there any evidence that the Hull FC shareholders are charging interest on their loans?

You enjoy it like my avatar says

Ask the shareholders of Hull FC how much they got back at the time of the "merger" It was precisely zero! The directors have been paid interest at 2% above base rate,,,,, so far![/code]

I have no worries about fc, they appear to be doing well financially. I am imputing into a discussion, I have a lot of friends in rugby who support both clubs, I would not want to see rovers get in to seroius trouble that it threatened their future..So my friend you need to get of you high horse

No I do not personally know the poster, I am amazed a former public figure decided to post what he did, I am even more amazed reading further down the thread

Most kr/fc posters are fine and will banter and wind each other, however some are arrogant, ignorant and egcotistic, unfortunatley he is one of them imo

None of which alters the fact Rovers have already been offered the chance to play in a premium stadium gifted to the city by the council on the back of huge cash windfall, and chose to go it alone. It's therefore a bit disinengenuous to start making out the council now owes you one because living the dream has put you £3m in debt.

It's not about the council "owing the club" it "owes the area".

Whilst that simple idea doesn't fit in to your inane fixations, it's common sense that council tax payers money is distributed accordingly.

Have a day off from talking out of your @rse.

I think you should be allowed to play your derby there, nearly all the fans would be accomodated, your average would be raised, every-one is happy.