1 in the same?

pathetic

You mean both, don't you?

If the letter is addressed to Lee, does that automatically mean there can be no Rufus Robin with another person in the suit at the derby?

I have no idea, to be honest i'm beyond caring now it's all rather tedious.

People on both sides need to grow up as after a sucessful testimonial for a good servant of the game we shouldn't end up moaning and groaning about something as petty as this.

Fair enough. Just pointing out that people are rather quick to jump to conclusions here. It's very possible that some people (however sad they might be) complained to the SMC, saying they were offended by the actions of your mascot. The SMC were then obliged to look into it and based on whatever evidence was available decided to impose the ban on Lee as an individual from all SMC events (ie Hull City matches as well). It has not been stated anywhere as far as I can see that there is a ban on the mascot per se, just the guy in the suit at the testimonial.

People badging this immediately as a dummy-spit from Rule look to be off the mark.

Hmm, what if fan went to the next derby there dressed in a Rufus costumer - would they get in?!

Think they must be annoyed at Rufus for his dreadful porkie in the first placeJust to get confirmed as I know there are a lot of rumours and text going around. I (Rufus) HAVE been banned from the KC staduim. This is because at the Richard Horne friendly game I went over to the Hull fans and wiggled my bum at them.

I have had an official letter from Hull FC quoting "The decision has been made to ban the individual acting as Rufus the Robin for an indefinite period of time from all events at the KC Stadium"

Guess this is one disadvantage of the SMC picking up our matchday costs - we lose control of the policing.

Bit different to Rovers, who are in complete charge of determining how many mascots can fit in CP and also are responsible for preventing any disorder, regardless of how many stewards call in sick.

That is the first factual thing you're said in all of this

2 mascots max. Damn that Super League Pig, I say.

At least now you've cleared up that it's not Rufus Robin that's been banned, only the individual acting as him in the testimonial.

So, in summary, from what is available at the moment:

The SMC (not FC or Rule) have banned Lee from all KC events (City and FC)
The ban relates only to him and not to Rufus Robin the mascot.

Is it just me, or do others think it a bit rich of Mrs B to be complaining about people muck raking on the basis of limited information?

If this is not a wind up then a whole lot of people need to take a long hard look in the mirror. What childish moron complained? what fool took any notice of the complaint? why cant the rest of us treat anyone from either club who thinks it is of any consequence with the contempt they deserve. It is stupid arguments like this that really put me off supporting either team there are things going on in the city that really do need people to get upset about, but this aint one of them.

dont think anyones gettin upset about it mate. i find it hilarious, much better than dancing on ice.