The 'conversation' about Sio started with the fact he is leaving Parramatta. Surprisingly the commentary team seemed quite unsure where he was heading and after a bit of hesitation one of them said 'maybe Super League, I think Catalans.' Don't know if it was Gould but the first response was 'He's too young and too good for that' and general agreement that he is a 'great finisher'. Eventually someone said it might be Hull KR and Gould wrapped things up with his 'he's better than that comment'.

Another rumour quoshed!

rlhttps://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Neil-Hudgell-Days-Hull-KR-signing-Hull-FC-players/story-22819713-detail/story.htmlrl

I suspect this will also slay the Lancaster one as well.

www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Hull-KR- ... story.html Chester saying he is preparing for 2015 with Travis in the team. May be we are not prepared to sell him then.

www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Hull-KR- ... story.html Chester saying he is preparing for 2015 with Travis in the team. May be we are not prepared to sell him then.

Club protocol .....

Do you mean saying something when it's true or saying something when it's not true?

The decision must be in Rovers hands. I can see us agreeing to a transfer for the reputed £100,000 if we were getting a suitable replacement. That would be good business. It would not be good business otherwise. £100,000 would be nothing if after the new signings to improve the backs we entered the new season with a second-class no 6.

Burns going Nowere unless an equal or better replacement is available . Source .... Paul fletcher from the mouth of hudgel

Change your source.

If he has gone. its a really weird statement by Chester.

Not really as it's not going to be announced until rovers season is over so what else can he say other than what he said

I wouldn't say anything, to say he hasn't heard anything and is planning to have him next season, will make him look a bit stupid if in two weeks he is sold.

Cas and Powell made no comment about Clark leaving until it was announced.

Surely you did not mean to say that. There are a number of things he could have said or he could have said nothing. Why bring the subject up at all in an article about another player if he was merely trying to gloss over a difficult situation?

Because the journalist asked the question?

Even if he was asked the question, he did not have to answer in that way. Of course it may be the slant put on it by the journalist. Dealing with the media is a skill in itself which among other things a good coach learns and was something unfortunately Sandy never came to terms with. I hope CC proves to be better.

I mean "club protocol" is the answer Hudge gave when asked why CC said he knew nothing about a move for Josh, then 24 Hrs later it was announced.
This is the same, if a certain 6 isn't signed for next year then Burns will be a Rovers player for 1 last season.

Must have missed Hudge saying that. Do you know who the certain player is then?