Here we go again.Same nutter who texts sport talk pretending to be a kr fan

bit harsh about sheens imo, both teams where well down in numbers yesterday, if rovers can get there full team on the pitch you stay up, but where both dropping like flies atm,

I think it says it all that imo 2 of our better players in the forwards were lee and tickle,kavanagh hopeless,clarkson tries hard but only average,donaldson 100%but not big enough,scruton past his best,greenwood looked promising but has gone backwards other than the leeds game where he played centre and they would be in the team regardless of injuries.Why he wont push quinlan into the halves and put moss at full back I dont know,we need some pace in the halves.I know we have been desperately unlucky with injuries,but we have some highly promising backs who should be used in emergencys rather than putting forwards in the halves.As for sheens out,i dont think so,who else could do better ?

Not sure who you’d replace him with but it’s a results based business and at the moment, results are not on Tim’s side. Sometimes just the change in leadership can spark a change in the players. It’s known as the Hawthorne Effect.

change is needed and now, we are rock bottom and it is simply not good enough.

So you keep saying but you don't come up with any answers to questions put to you the last time we sacked a coach mid season we ended up relegated you just seem like a troll to me

Call me a troll all you want you set of oddiments we are bottom of the league it is a results business so Sheens needs to go! But you would rather call a retired man a troll you do amuse me. Wake up and smell the coffee you fools.

Err.No! With 16 of a roster of 36 unavailable, that,s approx 45% missing. That is just ridiculous. I defy any coach, especially one coaching a team coming up from the Championship(which is what we are currently,unfortunately) to suddenly become a top 8 side.
Don,t forget, that when we played Wigan, Leeds, Saints at home the team were applauded off the pitch for having a really good go and the end results flattered the winners.
Yes it,s all about winning, but we are losing first choice players every match.
I hate losing, but we need some luck. Will we win any of the next 4, I don,t think so. Will I support my team, yes I will.
The backs are good, The pack very average, with one or two ok.
Are we good enough to stay up? with key players back, an aggressive attitude, and an ounce of good luck(for a change) or even two of those three, yes we are good enough and should be ok.
Time to back the team, and the coach.

to be fair think we should try to poach Radford now he has read Justin holbrooks "play like saints manual"and ditched his "barge over troubled water" how not to win a grand final with a big club,

So what was the difference with Chester when you had all of those injuries and a bad run of results?

Put simply he is/was responsible for our small mobile pack strategy,combined with a ridiculous pre season these were big factors among with a few others.He seems to have learnt lessons from his/our failure and built probably the biggest pack in the league.Decent back 5 and imo only a really good half back away from taking next step forward on league ladder.Looking back he was preferable to Webster but at the time it seemed the right call? Sheens is playing with a squad that needs freshening up(Not withstanding injuries)Reading tonight's HDM it seems he's finally realised this?

Sheens saw last year vs Wire that our pack was too small, it’s what every fan has seen for at least the last 3 years. He mentioned the need to recruit size post that match, so the requirement is not new to him.

The question should be, after the many well publicised recruitment failures “why can’t rovers sign decent players”? (cue the poor attempts at sarcasm from the dark spiders).

It’s clear funds are available but players don’t want to join the club so what is it that is stopping them?