Agree.

didnt see/hear sandercock post match any links or any run down of what was siad

"It's a tragedy. I'll be very disappointed if the video referee doesn't come out and publicly apologise.
"We're devastated. It's blatantly offside and we can't understand it.
"I'm proud of the boys. To come within a whisker with the side we had today was pretty special.
"Sometimes in this great game you don't get what you deserve and we didn't today."

Who cares what a few people on a social networking site say? I can absolutely guarantee that no one will stop following the game because a (video) referee made a poor call

Actually we [ican[/i see past it. Some of us are just beyond caring.

The officiating of RL in the UK is appalling and has been for the entire length of time I've been watching the game. That's around a quarter of a century. I've lost count of the number of times I've said that it would kill the game in the end. So far I've been wrong. Even more relevantly, if you check my posts when Ganson was announced as the new boss I was scathing in my criticism and predicted that things would go downhill.

But this decision is no worse than many other decisions Ganson has made over the years. Maybe the reason why some of us are not as exercised about it as you are is that we've seen it all before over many, many years. Cummins came out with some utter rubbish during his tenure after all.

Anyway - I read that the RFL are due to make a statement soon. If it includes the reasoning behind the decision then maybe we can have an informed discussion.

sandercock.what a plonker.

From Paul Cookes Twitter...


I was willing to give Ganson the benefit of the doubt, maybe he saw something we did not, but if this is true then it is unforgivable and once again makes our game a laughing stock to make such a basic error, the VR has as much time as needed to make his decision.

Not only on this occasion but in general I think that there is a fundamental flaw in the VR system as it is now in that it is still down to a single individual to judge the incident and if he makes an error then there is no one to correct it. Other sports that use judges use a panel, maybe we could have 3 VR's with a simple majority to decide an incident.

Apparently Jon Sharp has said that it was 'clearly a mistake'.

That should make his working relationship with Ganson interesting. How does he discipline the guy who shares responsibility for leading the officials with him?

quite true too

I actually did wonder that and dismissed it as too unlikely.

Oh dear.

Maybe it should have been a point each then. If only Billy had caught the ball .....

Like us last year, you put yourself in the position to have that decision given against you. Despite the pleas of better team lost, even without that shocking decision it would have been a draw and quite fair one at that.

Fact is we were very poor today, ŵe put so much ball down in the first half you should have been able to put many more points on us. We didn't get it together for the entire game. Hull as always like been the underdogs like against Warrington, we don't like been favourites as today proves, we panic and loose our flow.

Hull fans have got quite the claim for karma on this one. You lost, we won. Get over it.

mr ganson we love you

Anyway - that puts to bed any 'death of the game' concerns. Ganson knew the rules after all. He just - as many of us have said for some years - needs to visit SpecSavers.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0Gf80CVX3M

www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0Gf80CVX3M