So you don't think Celtic, Salford and Hull FC have been the worst teams overall this season? Who has been worse, overall?

And if picking up 2 points isn't the only thing that matter, what else does? The Fair Play index?

I think what he's trying to say is Hull are better than Rovers

I would imagine Rovers are still in the market for a new hooker however the fact that Hodgson was moved to the back row at Hull probably swayed his decision more then guarenteed 1st team rugby.

The one thing Rovers seem to have guarenteed Josh is the hooking role be it reserve level or 1st team and you cant blame the kid for wanting to play in his favoured position.

I value performance and effort as well as getting the 2 points. Celtic have put in some very good performances. On paper i dont think Hull FC are one of the worst teams and lots of things have contributed to where we are in the league. But im pretty sure that most SL teams would take a large percentage of our players should they become available. We've been poor because of poor coaching, simple as that. (obviously a reasonable debate will go out of the window here as you accuse me of FC bias etc)

Hull now only have 2 recognised hookers and one of them is very injury prone.

Rovers have Fisher, Cockayne and Murrell who i suspect will all play there in front of Josh to begin with.

So with your current squad and all of it's reported problems where would Justin have taken your squad of players? and I don't mean Pozition

but our coaching staff didn't see him as a hooker.

Well if the rumours are true youre talking to Paul King and Motu Tony to name but 2 on top of signing Hodgson and Haynes last season and you took Scott Wheeldon etc etc.

The only player we havent released was Cooke. (and we've been poor for 3 seasons now)

Does that mean Justin sees players on their merits and doesnt approach the bottom 3 clubs like you do?

Show me where i wrote off all 75 players. Either put up or apologise.

Indeed.

How silly.

my thoughts exactly.