KC must be a good pitch as it's the same as Liverpools and Real Madrids pitches so it's got to be up there.

The Craven Park pitch has certainly improved dramatically since the early days there.

I think now it is getting some of the recognition it desrves as an excellent playing surface.

Didn't your pitch cost something like £600,000?
Would imagine that it's one of the top pitches in the league.

Didn't know they played rugby league.

although i see your point as both those football clubs don't share there ground with another club, so the KC must be up there considering the hammering it gets.

Obviously the quality of any pitch will depend on the standard of the groundsman and the number of matches played on it. I believe a number of premiership soccer teams allow only first team games and train elsewhere as do their reserve and junior teams.

Fortunatley Rovers are in a position to allow only their first and reseve team to play at Craven Park thus usually limiting the surface to the minimum wear and tear. Othe clubs may not be so fortunate....and Man Utd for instance can still blame any defeat at home on the R.L. Grand Final played in September

better now ya not playing green carpet in the corners that was bad but a great playing surface now a nice big pitch to

He didnt say that did he

One pitch not mentioned so far surprisingly- Salford

always praised by everyone who plays on it- looks a picture all the time and of course NO FOOTBALL played on it which we all know does far more damage than RL ever will

Cas looks good as well- same reason and Wakefield has improved since part time football team stopped playing there

hence the "?"

dont quite get the point you are trying to make

KC pitch, Craven Park and wigan are also good