Like i've said before only an idiot uses stats in isolation to back up an argument.

You work that out how???

Because although stats do not form a full picture they give some facts (empirical evidence).which can be clearly used to support an argument,you appear to totally dismiss these and resort to calling people uneducated, but your arguments are based on what???

You claim Hally is the best centre in Hull and a future international..what do you base this on..

You alsio claim Hodgson is better than Houghton and also a future International..again what do you base this on...

You are starting to look rather silly now

Are you still on here, P*ss off!

Gather you do not like my posts then....

I dont mind your post when its actually joining in with a discussion.

I dont like them when all you do is bicker about e. Your becoming about as welcome as Mrs coffee.

Re-read my posts...no bickering just stating my opinions and backing them up with facts which are clear to see.....And your contribution/conter arguments are what???

The poop may not suit your ideas but hey ho

No its called bickering, your opinions are about Hall, Hodgson and Houghton - the thread is about Radford signing for Hull KR.

Like i said only an idiot would use then to back up their argument.

Yet you [ustill fail [/uto post what your arguments are based on

Is this a 5 minute argument,or a 10 minute one?