Quote Easty="Easty"Erm because of your recent result's, Knocked out the Challenge Cup at the first hurdle. The clear showing by your board of what your club is all about with the sacking of John Kear. And for a buy out it obiously means there is something there that Hetherington is worried about. If Hull was on such a good footing then she wouldn't sell would she Especially for the amount rumoured to be involved? Sinking ship I'd say. While at Rovers everything is quite the opposite.
And it's less likely to happen now you've a new coach? What with Mcnamara Pahhhhh stop kidding yourself. Whats true is at the moment your team is on the slide and Rovers are most certainly on the up.
Disagree and you'll be laugthed off this board like the fool you are.'"
I'd have been more concerned if we'd stuck with kear,i think they did the right thing and was one of the first to say so.What difference losing away to bradford narrowly in the challenge cup makes to your arguement i don't know.
As for the buy out,you could look at it 2 ways,if someone came in to buy rovers you'd claim it was because the investor had recognised the potential to develop the club and take it to the top,but because it's Hull everyones jumping ship.Have you read the article in tonights paper regarding the shareholders acting as gaurantors for a £500,000 mortgage to build our ambitious training complex?hardly the actions of a sinking ship.
You ridicule mcnamara without having any knowledge of his coaching abilities,i'll bet he knows more about the game than you could ever dream of knowing,so what makes you qualified to assess and mock his credentials?Did he not turn rovers down when they approached him?
as for rovers being on the up,come back in 6 months when you've got something to back your claims up with,it's just the annual hot air that comes from craven park and usually ends in a flood of tears.
'"
