I'll let you have a look.
It is there although all I'm saying is calm yourself down anyway.
If you wish to keep pushing it at least you can't pretend you were not at least asked nicely.

I wouldn't go as far a to say he's been gash, but we were certainly a more dangerous outfit this afternoon once Hall went to six.

He's a good player, but his niggling is of negative utility. He gets wound up rather than ever seeming to manage to wind up his opponents. Needs to concentrate on just playing his game - next season now I guess.

Too old to change his ways I'd say.

He's fun and also infuriating to watch. You've got to love his naughty side if he's in your team, but when the referee finally loses patience it's a real head in hands moment.

He came back on today after being binned and within thirty seconds he was back in Thaler's ear. That, to me says he's a young man too stupid to accept his responsibilities as a fulcrum of the team.

Both halves were poor today and that was an area of the game that we really should have looked to dominate if we wanted to win.

I'll make a positive point now. Yet another good showing from Aaron Ollett, James Green and Jordan Cox (although that's come to be expected), Tuimavave put in a great defensive stint and Adam Walker ran the ball hard and true. Josh Hodgson's try was nearly funnier than Patrick Transit Van's attempted kick through when already in touch.

That was a few positive's, clearly deluded.

The only other positive I could take is that at least we wont be going away to France in the play offs or have a potential position of having to lose the last game to avoid it.

It is a shame about Travis' arm. Whose face did he break it on?

wow! it's a shame it wasn't yours!

Because of your tasteless comment. I'm surpised at you, I thought you were better than that. Clearly I was wrong.

Since Mrs B got banned, the standard of FC troll on here has hit rock bottom.

Tasteless? Wow, you lot are easily offended. FFS, it's a broken arm - no one has died.

It's fairly well accepted (even amongst many of your own fans) that Burns isn't exactly squeaky clean. He's been known to make the odd reckless, even malicious, challenge where he didn't care whether or not he injured an opposing player. If I happen to make a tongue-in-cheek reference to this when commenting on his injury, I don't really see what the big deal is. Or do you expect outpourings of sympathy for your pantomime villain halfback?

Nope, I get it he's not your favourite player but as the old saying goes 'if you've nothing good to say then say nothing'. Gloating over a players injury seems pretty low

And how far do you extend your 'old saying'? Should no one say anything bad about anyone, ever?Regardless of what they've done?

And it's sod all to do with whether he's my favourite player or not. Dobson isn't my favourite player, but he's a bloody good one and one I respect for the way he plays the game. Burns, on the other hand, is a grubby cheap shot merchant who has form on both sides of the world for (deliberately, in at least one high profile case) tackling in a way that might cause injury to others. So, if I make a reference to his 'tackling' technique whilst not seeming to care an awful lot about his injury, I really don't think that constitues 'rock bottom', do you?