The wiki comment was obviously tongue in cheek but the point remains that mcrae will know more about the up and coming coaches in oz than 3 of rovers board members.

I'd quite happily let you make the rovers coaching appointment if it were up to me

Time for a new avatar eh?
MS Paint is calling

Yep, I agree McRae will know his stuff. And I took your point about Hudgell and his 'cronies' too seriously. But they've taken their time to find out what they need to know.

I think Pearson-McRae-Gentle have a good chance of making Hull much more successful.

I think we have cause for optimism too, if we get this appointment right - and I think they are going about it sensibly. It could all go to poop for either or both clubs - you never can tell. For now it looks promising.

Last time Hudgell went looking for a coach he came back with Morgan. He's earned our trust imo.

Not quite true.., Hudge will tell you himself Morgan was suggested to him by Tony Smith, he was not on the original short-list..

I know, any ideas?

I was merely responding to the idiot who suggested that mcrae didn't know what he was doing and that rovers 3 man task force would be much better at finding the best coach. I think you took my comments out of context

So that shows then that Hudgell is prepared to listen to peoples views who may know more about the game than he does and not just appoint his own man.

I don't care who was on the original list, he appointed Morgan

Wasn't it Daniel Anderson who recommended Morgan?

He's a rovers fan, he's been brainwashed to bow to lies

No, definitely T.Smith.

1. Bartos appears to be one of yours.

2. This side of the wall, be judicious in your use of stuff like 'brainwashed'. And 'inbreds', 'windowlickers' etc. Ta.

No he is not, he is a FC fan