Can still see Shannon signing for the Sharks,but mike black n white Gollum and blunderside have made a massive boo boo here, i will never boo anyone but can see it being quite hostile tomorrow for our No.1, no need to mention it at the moment!

True but there is a chance he is going to get a fair few booing him on Friday night.
Now although that isn't directly Mike Whites fault or problem there is the logic that what if this story isn't true do we conclude that Mike White was somehow responsible, I personally say not but the point still stands that some folks belive everything that the tellybox, radio or 'paper' tells them and no amount of denials will change that and as such they need to start taking things as a whole instead of just jumping to the whole 'It must be right as mr 'x' said so' as some are doing in this case.

Looooooooooooong sentence.

Don`t panic!

Yes, I'm sure East Hull's finest will make their feelings known.

Wouldn't the fact that something was made up, somewhat negate the need for getting facts right, due to the fact something being made up means it isn't a fact in the first place?
While you're looking for your manners ponder on that one.

I can only read aloud, I'd nearly gone blue by the end, people had the defibrillator out ready and charged.

Top fella me ol' Dudley,
Uncompromising yet cuddly,

Top the stratosphere he may be,
Out over Vegas he can see.

From this moment I'm never going to use full stops, they're so outdated, so fully and stoppy, they make my skin crawl to be honest and I much prefer, a load, of, randomly, placed, commas instead

He's definitely NOT coming to FC. FC fans can go back to the "bang average" line of opinion, Rovers fans can put their booing plans on the back burner at least.

Not quite sure what you are insinuating here. Are you saying White could be held responsible because he's:

a) made it up

b) repeated a mischievous wind-up inappropriately although innocently but should have known better

or

c) is speaking the truth when he should have been looking after Rovers' best interests and kept his black and white gob shut?

As a journalist doing his job to find out and break news, only if case a) is true could he be deemed to have to take responsibility for an inappropriate action. Both b) and c) are actions expected of an independent newsman, surely? And in either case of b) or C) wouldn't Rovers be best advised to identify their prankster or mole to stop any future cases of potential nasty booing?

Like "Silks" this. I want to be the naughty old barrister from the other law firm.

Ohh! The one in Garrow's Law? Erm, Garrow? I like him, but he's young, not old.

He is . keep it under your hat tho