Austin nfa it seems? Tomkins gets a caution? That's that I suppose.Taylor at Hull looking at 3 game ban. I watched that game (Not live) and didn't notice anything? Sam Tomkins threw a punch in Cats game and nfa? You really want to have faith in the system but leaves you a bit puzzled at times like these

Can see the return match at ours being tasty?
Right move on to London game now and put last weekend to bed

Hopefully the RFL will now ask Sheens to explain his post match comments re, Austin. It was nothing more than a flop and didn't warrant a yellow card. The touch judge didn't raise his flag and the ref only got involved when your players surrounded him throwing there arms around etc. Poor form from your coach and players. Very poor.

Sheens never said that what Austin did was illegal. He basically said you don't get sent to hospital for nothing and that he may be sweating this week. Wind your neck in. Austin has a duty of care which was the reason he was sin binned. It was deemed that the sin bin was sufficient hence no further action was taken.

If I’m honest I didn’t see anything in the tackle other than it was aggressive unfortunately we lost Tomkins for the game

Sheens called it as most saw it. Warrington very fortunate Austin didn't get a ban. What's poor is Warrington fans saying Tomkins deserved his injury etc. Any team with Westwood and Hill on payroll can't take any moral high ground. Like I said earlier in thread the fact he hasn't been banned won't affect us at all so really it's just hot air. How Austin got nowt and Taylor gets 3 is just baffling?

The still looks quite nasty but ruled accidental https://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/blake ... 095f8fa72d

The still looks quite nasty but ruled accidental https://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/blake ... 095f8fa72d

After John Boudebza’s ban from a few years ago nowt surprises me on that front.

This was the decision...…

Just looked at it he looks like he is kneeing him in the head

No case to answer from disciplinary. Tomkins got a warning.

JOEL TOMKINS - HULL KR
WARRINGTON V HULL KR - SUPER LEAGUE
DETAILS OF CHARGE / REASON FOR NF :
Player swings around opponent with momentum of tackle. Player grips collar of opponent and drops weight onto the ground through the hip. Footage does not demonstrate contact is made. Worthy of MRP caution. Rule – 15.1(i) Detail - Defender uses any part of his body forcefully to twist, bend or otherwise apply pressure to the limb or limbs of an opposing player in a way that involves an unacceptable risk of injury to that player. Caution
DECISION:
Caution
INCIDENT:
Dangerous Contact in the 27th minute (Lineham)

It would have been difficult to ban him based on the video that was available. Unless there is another angle which I haven't seen. You can't see for sure whether his knee contacts the head and if it does it seems unlikely that it was intentional. There are a couple of stills which show Joel in a pretty vulnerable looking position with his head bowed low as he tries to get up. I wondered if the weight of the challenge forced his head into the ground and that was what caused the concussion. I'm speculating of course.

I think thats a pretty good assessment of how it happened,joel was in an awkward position and the pressure of austins tackle pushed his head down.

2 games in and theres been some dubious disciplinary calls already, just gotta hope theres consistency though but that never seems to be the case.
Anyway Warrington and Blake Austin are behind us now so lets move on to this weekends game.