Don't you mean hair?.

green has looked a bit of a pudding when I've seen him. Does a decent run then you don't see him for about the next 3 sets. Similar to how chris green has been for us but he is getting better. Not sure if it is a fitness/stamina issue

Not that I'm aware, no.

I like Green but I don't think he's as good as some make out I know he wants an NRL gig and supposed to be Newcastle bound but I personally don't think he's good enough

I agree Frankie. Green's a half decent larker but a bit too head up, full ahead and one dimensional for me. His defensive timing and overall defensive intensity is a bit hit and miss on occasions too, like on Saturday when he and Walker were made to look ordinary and Micky Mouse on the goal line for George Griffin's try, Salfords 4th.

Could be that these core assets are deemed perfect for a WIP development project by a struggling NRL team like Newcastle.

Exactly right and it proves beyond doubt how difficult it is to build over a long period of time from ground zero. It's a good job Pearson had a longer term view than even me. KR will need the same hence the 5 year plan presumably. There's too much energy wasted talking about sacking coaches (me included last April). It's the player quality in the squad that has by far the biggest impact on results which is why the players at FC take far more credit for their current position in the league than does Radford.

I never hold that idea, it seems to be who the coach is whether or not the fans think its him or not. LR has to take credit for his teams good position as much as he had to take criticism for the previous poor performances.

Liverpool FC are a classic for this, they have pilloried Rodgers for his poor performances (regardless of finishing 2nd) yet Klopp seems to be able to do no wrong whilst still turning out some awful performances

The players are picked by the coach, and ultimately it is the coach who will (rightly so) live and die by the results and performances.

Tomkins has had is charge down graded and will be banned for a week for the 'tackle' on Albert. It was an absolute shocker and it was only luck that meant we haven't another star player sitting out the season. No consistency.

Are you surprised. You only get banned if your from hull or rovers

Ridiculous and slightly embarrassing statement with zero substance. Why do fans insist on making stupid conspiracy theorist rhetoric in an attempt to justify any type of action (or lack of) from:

1. The RFL
2. Referees
3. The European Union
4. etc.

"The whole world hates my team and that is why we haven't won a major trophy in xxx years".
"If he/she/them played for the bigger boys they would have received a knighthood".

Grow up.

Calm down dear

widnes have had a couple banned which will mean they miss their game against you

i think recruitment is your biggest problem as one poster said morgan seemed to know what he was signing, (newton etc) motu tony seems to know players who are committed and those who arent, (miniciello etc )mike smith your ceo goes to aus and signs players on reputation (tilse etc ) .hopefully next season jamie peacock will find the players who want to play and are committed to the cause

Think the reply starts with "No" has an expletive in the middle and ends in "Sherlock"