How is a "lower than anticipated loss" bad news?

Mrs B is becoming a legend

Banned from here and even your chairman is talking about her

Roverswall wrote:Is that supposed to be insightful?

Not Really , Mr Hudgell admits himself in his column you've made a loss.


He also admits it's not a problem if he decides to spend his money where he wants to .

I realise that Lacyface could be mistaken for Mrs B because both post similar
e, but Mrs B had decent spelling....e with figures mind you .

This clown obviously has need of special education.

Well done for proving you can read.
Unfortunatly so can everyone else.
So exactly what you hoped to achive but posting stuff that anyone with any interest would have already read is beyond me.
Did mummy noy pay you enough attention when you were growing up perhaps?

Nope but trying to troll and destroy threads is.
Have a look.

1.4. Messages intended to destroy threads or to only increase post counts are prohibited
* Users who intentionally aim to prevent conversation on a thread will have their posts removed and risk losing posting rights on the board in question, or to the whole site.

It seems someone doesnt think 1 ban is enough hopefully she will keep it up and get her IP banned.

I still want to know how a lower than anticipated loss is bad news.

Ignore the troll and discuss Hudge's comments is my advice.

Go on then, I'll have a little nibble. I don't think you're hugely trolling, neither (at the moment, I remember you strolling around these parts previously) do I think you are Mrs. Barista/cabwoman.

This is obviously all conjecture and opinion but this is my take on it.

1) I can't see how our license is at threat at the moment, we weren't one of the clubs to receive warning letters from The RFL. However, moving forward the club concedes that we need to improve the stadium. The Chair person who's brought us back from the dead and turned us into a reasonable SL side over a short period of time is saying we're almost in a position to take things forward. We've heard this before but then apparently circumstances changed. Let's hope they don't this time, we'll see.

2) As you are more than aware other than Leeds and Hull (and perhaps one other that's slipped my mind?) all clubs are making a loss of some sort or other. I think even Leeds may have made a loss this/last year due to the ongoing South Stand improvements. Hudgell tells us that the debt is manageable whilst this BOD remains in place. He has also said that the club needs to become self sustainable, this mainly depends on the ground improvements and a subsequent increase in crowds. On crowds people usually fall into two camps. Camp a) Hull Kingston Rovers crowds have fallen for the last two years, why should they increase with a bigger ground and; Camp b) Latent fans are put off from attending because they can only get tickets for the areas with poor views and facilities. Surprisingly, as a relatively optimistic Hull Kingston Rovers fan, I fall into Camp b).

3) Hudgell says the loss will be less than anticipated, I have reason to disbelieve this although I'm aware of speculation from people who claim to be "in the know" that Rovers have serious financial problems. The signing of a former Australian Test and SoO forward and extension of contracts for some of the cubs highest earners would appear to mitigate against this. Again, time will tell.

Fair summation, IMO.