It was supposed to be a tongue in cheek remark, i would not realy fall out with him should he be incorrect, though i would be a tad dissapointed seeing that he usualy does know more than the average supporter shall we say regarding the clubs affairs.
It would also reinforce my view that its often best to wait for the facts to emmerge rather than believe every rumour you hear every week in the HP bar for instance, of which there are many.

me thinks theres more eddie tham edith ? as for mcdonnell good fb and would love him at fc,

In order for your rumours to have credibility they have to at least be in the ball park of "believable". Your rumours just got shot to pieces as its not conceivable that you could obtain a job.

Willerby caravans , back at work tomorrow after a weeks unpaid holiday Edit-AS vat scare

I`m not feeling the love here.


If its true McDonnell "Isn`t bothered who he signs for," not much cop as far as commitment goes ,is it?

What u saying Edith is eddie from HDM

sorry ginger for getting u into trouble, what i meant was is edith all she appears to be? if you get my meaning, might be wrong but dont think so

Ah just a misunderstanding from cravenpark1 I'm sure when he re-reads it hel realise

If the reports are true (apparently on RH this morning) and SM is signing for FC then the 'reaction' on Friday won't be pretty.

In fact, and bearing in mind the importance of keeping momentum going, IMO there is a distinct possibility the reaction will affect the whole team and act in the Dragons favour, which is why I suggest SM be dropped for the game - a sort of cooling off period.

For goodness' sake. If it's true, it's simply a case of Rovers providing him with a shop window and FC paying a fair market value. Why vilify the player?