Congratulations. The last time I looked the RFL could overrule/ disagree refereeing decisions (they are employed by the RFL after all) based on panel reviews - which is exactly what has happened here. On this occasion I'm happy that you're wrong and that you clearly are a complete tool!

You mean you'll trust someone that writes on the website over an actual referee?

Each to their own.







Think it's time you let it go.

Right back at you with that last comment. Lets just agree that I (along with every other sane person who isn't wearing blinkers) think it was a shoulder charge, and you think it wasn't. Does that finally calm you down and make you happy?

Where's he gone?

hes hiding like the rest of us lol

Your hiding place is a bit naff!

Oh come on, now you're just antagonising him, that really isn't fair, we'd both moved on and everything

I'm happy that an actual professional referee, who is an expert in his field, saw the FACT that it wasn't a shoulder charge.

Time to get out of the bitter barn!

On the initial report it said "shoulder charge used", they just contradict themselves and make themselves look even more stupid

I don't even know why I'm getting involved, can't be d to link it and don't even care to be fair. Got bored of the ridiculous, corrupt, I consistant RFL ruining the game a long long time ago.

Anyway, glad we've all agreed that watts didn't shoulder charge kelly

I think he did