Well if we do play at the kfc for the whole year then I disagree with you, it would be a disaster for rovers, I know many people who would ask for their money back. You forget the older brigade, they are stuck in their ways, like to stand where they allways stand, amongst the same people in familliar surroundings. And like my old man who's 75, wouldn't touch the kfc with a barge pole. At least get the east stand ext built and we can go on from there.

what Sandra said i agree with blimey thats twice i agree with Sandra better not tell the wife i never agree with her

Just tell your old brigade your returning to your original roots :

Where do you think the club are gonna get money to build the east stand extension if they are still trying to get north stand funding?

For me personally It wouldn't bother me if my club had to move to a miles better ground even if it was in East Hull.

Can't see anything in this. The cost of renting the KC would outweigh any benefits for all but the derby game.

That's the first sane comment I've seen on this thread.

You're currently paying a nominal rent for NCP, you'd see a fair increase if you were to move to the KC

A huge number of Rovers fans would walk away from the club if they moved to West Hull so the owners would have to be idiots to sanction this.

half empty stadium is very optimistic

I can honestly say hand on heart if we moved to the KC I wud not attend as much as I love the club and have for 33 Years it's not the route I wud choose to go down I'd prob just Stik to going to away games I just can't get my head round avin to sit at the KC, so I'm hoping it's all a load of twaddle

IF WE WANT THE KC THEN WE WILL GET IT

ALLAM WILL SORT US OUT AS NEILS BEST MATE. WE CAN TURN IT INTO A GIANT RED AND WHITE PYRAMID STRUCTURE IN HIS HONOUR

It's only so burdensome on FC because they pull in well over 7,500 fans. The ground rent wouldn't be [ithat much[/i more than repayments on the new North Stand.



Some would, and they'd no doubt be vocal. Enough to kill the club? Very possibly. But staying in an [iundeveloped[/i Craven Park isn't viable long-term either - so it'd be more a case of no good options than idiocy.

I suspect, or hope at least, that the reality is different to what's on the surface.

I didn't know Hull City owned the KC.

Been obvious this was the next step ever since the cosy relationship betwene hudge and allam started. Mp issue from me and if a few rovers fans spit their dummies this will be more than offset by new fans and increased revenue from other sources.

It will give Hull the bargaining power to improve their deal so wins all around for me

And when the pitch needs renewing every year?