Straight back at you. That clearly FORWARD pass is all you have to cling on to, it defines your hapless season, which is now over.

No it really isnt. Our performances have been poor this year but we put alot more effort in yesterday whilst still missing a couple of quality players.

Some calls you get some you dont can you honestly say you wouldnt have been peed off if it was Rovers on the receiving end of that call?

If the ref had penalised cordura for the push on dobson which led to a drop out and your first try then you would have been nilled at half time instead you were right back in the game swings n roundabouts

correct

If the judge had of jailed cooke instead of giving him a suspended senetence we'd have won all of the derbies since you were promoted

Oh my God. They've progressed from being ripped off by the ref to being stitched up by the legal system.

]'"

I think your confusing a statement of fact for something else but each to their own.
Regardless of talking points the result is now fish and chip paper.'"

Ile back you up slightly here Rob, if i may?

Impartiality does not come into it, Hes the Rovers commentator, specialising in just that, hes also a fan, therefore he shows hes elation and happiness when we get a result, so he should.'"

The ball is allowed to travel forward provided it comes out of the hands in a backward motion.

It did both so the try should have stood of that there is no doubt.

Correct, and incorrect!

Anyone claiming that was a forward pass is taking Rovers blinkerdness (is that even a word?) to a whole new level. I'm 99% certain that nobody is THAT thick so I'm assuming it is a trolling attempt? (the 1% factor comes into play when taking into account some of the complete rubbish spouted by the 3 posters on this thread who think it was forward)

Camera angles are deceptive regarding forward passes.

I can tell you the pass was forward, even taking into account the momentum rule.

I can also tell you to expect more Rovers domination of the city next season.